Philip D. Meyer

2.3k citations
40 papers · 1.6k · h-index 17

Impact in

Papers in

Philip D. Meyer

37 papers receiving 1.5k citations

Peers

Philip D. Meyer
Comparison fields: 5 of 97
  • Environmental Engineering 1.1k
  • Geochemistry and Petrology 184
  • Water Science and Technology 397
  • Ocean Engineering 400
  • Civil and Structural Engineering 523
Replace Steen Christensen with:
Steen Christensen Denmark
Jianfeng Wu China
Vittorio Di Federico Italy
Anis Younès France
Wenqing Wang Germany
H. J. Morel‐Seytoux United States
Andrew F. B. Tompson United States
Pierre Perrochet Switzerland
Claire R. Tiedeman United States
Insa Neuweiler Germany
Philip D. Meyer relative to Steen Christensen Denmark Steen Christensen's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2.7×
Steen Christensen · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Philip D. Meyer

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Philip D. Meyer's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Philip D. Meyer with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Philip D. Meyer more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Philip D. Meyer

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Philip D. Meyer. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Philip D. Meyer. The network helps show where Philip D. Meyer may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Philip D. Meyer, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Philip D. Meyer Line = papers co-authored together Philip D. Meyer links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 40 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2008219
2 2004176
3 1996157
4 1994131
5 1988126
6 200589
7 199571
8 200261
9 199960
10 201459
11 200258
12 200158
13 200448
14 198944
15 201342
16 200030
17 201029
18 201012
19 200411
20 200311

About Philip D. Meyer

Philip D. Meyer is a scholar working on Environmental Engineering, Civil and Structural Engineering, Ocean Engineering, Water Science and Technology and Mechanical Engineering, having authored 40 papers that have together received 1.6k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Groundwater flow and contamination studies (28 papers), Soil and Unsaturated Flow (11 papers), Hydrology and Watershed Management Studies (7 papers), Reservoir Engineering and Simulation Methods (7 papers), Hydraulic Fracturing and Reservoir Analysis (5 papers), Water Systems and Optimization (4 papers), CO2 Sequestration and Geologic Interactions (4 papers) and Hydrological Forecasting Using AI (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Environmental Engineering (1.1k citations), Geochemistry and Petrology (184 citations), Water Science and Technology (397 citations), Ocean Engineering (400 citations) and Civil and Structural Engineering (523 citations). Philip D. Meyer has collaborated with scholars based in United States, China and Switzerland. Frequent co-authors include Ming Ye, Shlomo P. Neuman, E. Downey Brill, Albert J. Valocchi, J. Wayland Eheart, K. Prasad Saripalli, G.W. Gee, Martinus Th. van Genuchten, H. J. Morel‐Seytoux and R. J. Lenhard. Their work appears in journals such as Water Resources Research, Vadose Zone Journal, Ground Water, Applied Geochemistry and Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact