Philip Crowe
Impact in
- Cancer Research top 5%
- Breast Cancer Treatment Studies
- Protease and Inhibitor Mechanisms
- Oncology top 5%
- Cytokine Signaling Pathways and Interactions
Papers in
- Co-authors
- Jialin Yang (20 shared papers)Shing Wai Wong (21 shared papers)David Goldstein (15 shared papers)Pamela J. Russell (18 shared papers)Xiaochun Wang (11 shared papers)Ashley R. Dennison (5 shared papers)Hui Jun Lim (2 shared papers)Jialin Yang (3 shared papers)
- Journals
- ANZ Journal of Surgery (14 papers)Journal of Cancer Research and Clinical Oncology (4 papers)World Journal of Surgery (4 papers)Journal of Surgical Oncology (3 papers)The Medical Journal of Australia (2 papers)
- Partner nations
- AustraliaUnited KingdomUnited States
In The Last Decade
Philip Crowe
116 papers receiving 2.7k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 142
- Cancer Research 447
- Oncology 613
- Surgery 675
- Pathology and Forensic Medicine 259
- Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine 451
Countries citing papers authored by Philip Crowe
This map shows the geographic impact of Philip Crowe's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Philip Crowe with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Philip Crowe more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Philip Crowe
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Philip Crowe. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Philip Crowe. The network helps show where Philip Crowe may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Philip Crowe, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
Showing the 20 most-cited of 119 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2012 | 175 | |
| 2 | 2005 | 153 | |
| 3 | 2014 | 135 | |
| 4 | 2000 | 108 | |
| 5 | 1984 | 97 | |
| 6 | 2000 | 96 | |
| 7 | 2010 | 86 | |
| 8 | 2003 | 67 | |
| 9 | 2009 | 66 | |
| 10 | 2013 | 64 | |
| 11 | 1999 | 56 | |
| 12 | 2005 | 51 | |
| 13 | 2010 | 47 | |
| 14 | 1998 | 46 | |
| 15 | 1992 | 46 | |
| 16 | 2003 | 45 | |
| 17 | 2016 | 45 | |
| 18 | 2013 | 44 | |
| 19 | 1996 | 42 | |
| 20 | 2023 | 39 |
About Philip Crowe
Philip Crowe is a scholar working on Surgery, Oncology, Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine, Molecular Biology and Pathology and Forensic Medicine, having authored 119 papers that have together received 2.8k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Surgical Simulation and Training (13 papers), Sarcoma Diagnosis and Treatment (12 papers), HER2/EGFR in Cancer Research (10 papers), Colorectal Cancer Treatments and Studies (6 papers), Anatomy and Medical Technology (6 papers), Mechanisms of cancer metastasis (5 papers), Clinical Nutrition and Gastroenterology (5 papers) and Genetic factors in colorectal cancer (5 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Cancer Research (447 citations), Oncology (613 citations), Surgery (675 citations), Pathology and Forensic Medicine (259 citations) and Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine (451 citations). Philip Crowe has collaborated with scholars based in Australia, United Kingdom and United States. Frequent co-authors include Jialin Yang, Shing Wai Wong, David Goldstein, Pamela J. Russell, Xiaochun Wang, Ashley R. Dennison, Hui Jun Lim, Jialin Yang, Christophe R. Berney and G T Royle. Their work appears in journals such as ANZ Journal of Surgery, Journal of Cancer Research and Clinical Oncology, World Journal of Surgery, Journal of Surgical Oncology and The Medical Journal of Australia.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.