Philip Cox

127 papers receiving 2.1k citations

Peers

Philip Cox
Comparison fields: 5 of 133
  • Pharmaceutical Science 210
  • Biochemistry 198
  • Physical and Theoretical Chemistry 262
  • Organic Chemistry 734
  • Inorganic Chemistry 339
Replace Atanu Barik with:
Atanu Barik India
Thammarat Aree Thailand
Iwona Wawer Poland
Hiroko Seki Japan
Uk Lee South Korea
Giovanni Fronza Italy
Takashi Matsumoto Japan
Elżbieta Budzisz Poland
J. W. Cornforth United Kingdom
G. Büchi United States
Philip Cox relative to Atanu Barik India Atanu Barik's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×3.2×
Atanu Barik · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Philip Cox

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Philip Cox's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Philip Cox with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Philip Cox more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Philip Cox

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Philip Cox. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Philip Cox. The network helps show where Philip Cox may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Philip Cox, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Philip Cox Line = papers co-authored together Philip Cox links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 130 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2007290
2 2002176
3 2000166
4 2002104
5 1999100
6 200993
7 200574
8 198557
9 200954
10 200245
11 198244
12 200841
13 198441
14 201539
15 200336
16 200334
17 198230
18 200330
19 200330
20 199630

About Philip Cox

Philip Cox is a scholar working on Inorganic Chemistry, Physical and Theoretical Chemistry, Organic Chemistry, Oncology and Cancer Research, having authored 130 papers that have together received 2.3k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Crystal structures of chemical compounds (47 papers), Crystallography and molecular interactions (27 papers), Organometallic Compounds Synthesis and Characterization (25 papers), Metal complexes synthesis and properties (22 papers), Natural product bioactivities and synthesis (18 papers), Phytochemistry and Biological Activities (12 papers), Sesquiterpenes and Asteraceae Studies (12 papers) and Synthesis and Reactivity of Sulfur-Containing Compounds (9 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Pharmaceutical Science (210 citations), Biochemistry (198 citations), Physical and Theoretical Chemistry (262 citations), Organic Chemistry (734 citations) and Inorganic Chemistry (339 citations). Philip Cox has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Greece and United States. Frequent co-authors include Yashodharan Kumarasamy, Satyajit Dey Sarker, Prof. Lutfun Nahar, Dale L. Munday, Marcel Jaspars, Maureen Byres, P. Aslanidis, R.A. Howie, JAMES Lewis WARDELL and Ronald H. Thomson. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of the Chemical Society Perkin Transactions 2, Journal of the Chemical Society Perkin Transactions 1, Acta Crystallographica Section C Crystal Structure Communications, Journal of Organometallic Chemistry and International Journal of Pharmaceutics.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact