Philip Copestake

25 papers receiving 512 citations

Peers

Philip Copestake
Comparison fields: 5 of 57
  • Paleontology 289
  • Earth-Surface Processes 243
  • Geology 153
  • Geophysics 191
  • Atmospheric Science 243
Replace Leonardo Tedeschi with:
Leonardo Tedeschi Brazil
Pedro Víctor Zalán Brazil
Mohamed El Tabakh United States
Sarah K. Carmichael United States
Helen S. Morgans‐Bell United Kingdom
Peter R. Sharland
Valentin Zuchuat Norway
Juliano Küchle Brazil
Jingquan Zhu China
Fabrice Gaumet France
Philip Copestake relative to Leonardo Tedeschi Brazil Leonardo Tedeschi's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×
Leonardo Tedeschi · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Philip Copestake

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Philip Copestake's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Philip Copestake with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Philip Copestake more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Philip Copestake

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Philip Copestake. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Philip Copestake. The network helps show where Philip Copestake may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Philip Copestake, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Philip Copestake Line = papers co-authored together Philip Copestake links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 29 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1993135
2 199260
3 199256
4 201346
5 200239
6 202035
7
Concise International Chemical Assessment Document 67
200535
8 201933
9 199322
10 198520
11 202019
12 202014
13 20209
14 20218
15 19968
16 20176
17 20205
18 19824
19 19903
20 20223

About Philip Copestake

Philip Copestake is a scholar working on Paleontology, Geophysics, Atmospheric Science, Earth-Surface Processes and Geology, having authored 29 papers that have together received 571 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Paleontology and Stratigraphy of Fossils (15 papers), Geological and Geochemical Analysis (11 papers), Geological formations and processes (10 papers), Geology and Paleoclimatology Research (10 papers), Geological and Geophysical Studies (8 papers), Hydrocarbon exploration and reservoir analysis (4 papers), Evolution and Paleontology Studies (4 papers) and Geochemistry and Geologic Mapping (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Paleontology (289 citations), Earth-Surface Processes (243 citations), Geology (153 citations), Geophysics (191 citations) and Atmospheric Science (243 citations). Philip Copestake has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Australia and Ireland. Frequent co-authors include David C. Mudge, Mark A. Partington, John R. Underhill, Matías Reolid, John Warburton, Tim Daley, J. D. Smewing, Ian Boomer, F. T. Banner and Robert J. Raine. Their work appears in journals such as Geological Society London Memoirs, Marine and Petroleum Geology, Geological Society London Special Publications, Palaeogeography Palaeoclimatology Palaeoecology and The Journal of Foraminiferal Research.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact