Philip Catney

20 papers receiving 532 citations

Peers

Philip Catney
Comparison fields: 5 of 88
  • Urban Studies 55
  • Pollution 96
  • Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law 94
  • Public Administration 26
  • Sociology and Political Science 307
Replace Will Eadson with:
Will Eadson United Kingdom
Romain Felli Switzerland
Kate Theobald United Kingdom
Frank N. Laird United States
Inger‐Lise Saglie Norway
Marianna Markantoni United Kingdom
Viviana Asara Austria
Bipasha Baruah Canada
Jesse Hoffman Netherlands
Robin Broad United States
Philip Catney relative to Will Eadson United Kingdom Will Eadson's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×7.6×
Will Eadson · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Philip Catney

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Philip Catney's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Philip Catney with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Philip Catney more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Philip Catney

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Philip Catney. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Philip Catney. The network helps show where Philip Catney may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 20 scholars most cited alongside Philip Catney, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Philip Catney Line = papers co-authored together Philip Catney links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
#Work
1 2013119
2 200867
3 201348
4 201348
5 201938
6 200738
7 200837
8 201129
9 201225
10 201924
11 200622
12 201521
13 200814
14 20099
15 20088
16 20235
17 20095
18 20074
19 20083
20 20082

About Philip Catney

Philip Catney is a scholar working on Sociology and Political Science, Political Science and International Relations, Finance, Global and Planetary Change and Urban Studies, having authored 20 papers that have together received 566 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Housing, Finance, and Neoliberalism (7 papers), Sustainability and Climate Change Governance (5 papers), Social Policy and Reform Studies (4 papers), Political and Economic history of UK and US (4 papers), Social Acceptance of Renewable Energy (3 papers), Risk and Safety Analysis (2 papers), Urban Planning and Governance (2 papers) and Disaster Management and Resilience (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Urban Studies (55 citations), Pollution (96 citations), Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law (94 citations), Public Administration (26 citations) and Sociology and Political Science (307 citations). Philip Catney has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Sweden and Canada. Frequent co-authors include John Henneberry, Zoë Robinson, Tom Stafford, Simon Ross, Andrew Dobson, Sarah Marie Hall, Sherilyn MacGregor, J. Richard Eiser, Sarah Royston and David N. Lerner. Their work appears in journals such as Local Environment, Journal of Environmental Management, Journal of Environmental Policy & Planning, Interdisciplinary Science Reviews and Town Planning Review.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact