Philip Amis

808 citations
31 papers · 477 · h-index 12

Impact in

  • Urban Studies top 0.5%
    • Urban and Rural Development Challenges
    • Urban Planning and Governance
  • Finance top 10%
    • Housing, Finance, and Neoliberalism

Papers in

Philip Amis

31 papers receiving 359 citations

Peers

Philip Amis
Comparison fields: 5 of 64
  • Urban Studies 267
  • Finance 66
  • Soil Science 57
  • Safety Research 37
  • Economics and Econometrics 115
Replace Somsook Boonyabancha with:
Somsook Boonyabancha Thailand
Paul van Lindert Netherlands
Sundar Burra India
Allison Goebel Canada
Celine D’Cruz India
Jan Hesselberg Norway
Alan Mabin South Africa
Davison Muchadenyika South Africa
Solomon Benjamin India
Benjamin Marx United States
Philip Amis relative to Somsook Boonyabancha Thailand Somsook Boonyabancha's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2.8×
Somsook Boonyabancha · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Philip Amis

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Philip Amis's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Philip Amis with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Philip Amis more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Philip Amis

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Philip Amis. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Philip Amis. The network helps show where Philip Amis may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 8 scholars most cited alongside Philip Amis, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Philip Amis Line = papers co-authored together Philip Amis links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 31 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1984106
2 199571
3 201550
4 200040
5 200127
6 199626
7 199421
8 198914
9 199113
10 200111
11 199511
12 199411
13 199710
14 19919
15 20117
16 19956
17
Urban economic growth and poverty reduction
19996
18 20055
19
Thinking about chronic urbanpoverty, CPRC Working Paper No. 12
20025
20 20145

About Philip Amis

Philip Amis is a scholar working on Urban Studies, Sociology and Political Science, Political Science and International Relations, Finance and Safety Research, having authored 31 papers that have together received 477 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Urban and Rural Development Challenges (14 papers), Income, Poverty, and Inequality (7 papers), Social and Economic Development in India (5 papers), South Asian Studies and Conflicts (4 papers), Housing, Finance, and Neoliberalism (3 papers), Poverty, Education, and Child Welfare (3 papers), Urban Planning and Governance (2 papers) and Land Use and Ecosystem Services (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Urban Studies (267 citations), Finance (66 citations), Soil Science (57 citations), Safety Research (37 citations) and Economics and Econometrics (115 citations). Philip Amis has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Brazil. Frequent co-authors include Carole Rakodi, Dan van der Horst, Marcelo Gomes Miguez, Antônio Augusto Rossotto Ioris, Peter Lloyd, Ursula Grant, Michael Hubbard and Richard Batley. Their work appears in journals such as Environment and Urbanization, Journal of International Development, Habitat International, Development Policy Review and Geographical Journal.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact