Phil Booth

429 citations
21 papers · 183 · h-index 7

Impact in

  • Classics top 5%
    • Byzantine Studies and History
    • Medieval Literature and History
  • History top 5%
    • Historical and Religious Studies of Rome

Papers in

    • Byzantine Studies and History 19
    • Medieval Literature and History 3
    • Historical and Religious Studies of Rome 2

Phil Booth

14 papers receiving 78 citations

Peers

Phil Booth
Comparison fields: 5 of 18
  • Classics 101
  • History 49
  • Anthropology 27
  • Philosophy 34
  • Religious studies 16
Replace Maria G. Parani with:
Maria G. Parani Cyprus
Martin Hinterberger
Johannes Köder Austria
Yuri P. Stoyanov United Kingdom
Fiona K. Haarer United Kingdom
Stratis Papaioannou United States
Eric McGeer
Ralph-Johannes Lilie Germany
Marie-France Auzépy France
Pauline Allen Australia
Phil Booth relative to Maria G. Parani Cyprus Maria G. Parani's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×3×4×5×
Maria G. Parani · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Phil Booth

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Phil Booth's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Phil Booth with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Phil Booth more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Phil Booth

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Phil Booth. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Phil Booth. The network helps show where Phil Booth may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 4 scholars most cited alongside Phil Booth, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Phil Booth Line = papers co-authored together Phil Booth links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 21 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 201463
2 201350
3
An age of saints? : power, conflict and dissent in early medieval Christianity
201117
4 201314
5 20159
6 20118
7 20157
8 20175
9 20112
10 20132
11 20192
12 20091
13 20111
14
Crisis of empire doctrine and dissent at the end of late Antiquity
20141
15 20211
16 20110
17 20130
18 20170
19 20190
20 20200

About Phil Booth

Phil Booth is a scholar working on Classics, History, Archeology, Anthropology and Sociology and Political Science, having authored 21 papers that have together received 183 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Byzantine Studies and History (19 papers), Medieval Literature and History (3 papers), Historical and Linguistic Studies (2 papers), Historical and Religious Studies of Rome (2 papers), Archaeology and Historical Studies (1 paper) and Classical Antiquity Studies (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Classics (101 citations), History (49 citations), Anthropology (27 citations), Philosophy (34 citations) and Religious studies (16 citations). Phil Booth has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Catherine Cubitt, Richard M. Price, Peter Sarris and Bronwen Neil. Their work appears in journals such as Byzantinische Zeitschrift, The Journal of Theological Studies, The Journal of Ecclesiastical History, Studies in Church History and Oxford University Press eBooks.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact