Peter Sarris
Impact in
- Classics top 1%
- Byzantine Studies and History
- Medieval Literature and History
- Anthropology top 2%
- Classical Antiquity Studies
- Eurasian Exchange Networks
Papers in
- Classics 20
- Byzantine Studies and History 16
- Medieval Literature and History 5
- Anthropology 14
- Classical Antiquity Studies 9
- Eurasian Exchange Networks 5
- Co-authors
- Phil Booth (2 shared papers)Marios Costambeys (1 shared paper)Warren Brown (1 shared paper)Jonathan P. Conant (1 shared paper)Matthew Innes (1 shared paper)Jairus Banaji (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- Journal of Agrarian Change (2 papers)The American Historical Review (2 papers)Early Medieval Europe (1 paper)Historical Materialism (1 paper)Past & Present (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United KingdomSouth SudanUnited States
In The Last Decade
Peter Sarris
28 papers receiving 461 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 54
- Classics 283
- Anthropology 297
- Archeology 252
- History 190
- Religious studies 29
Countries citing papers authored by Peter Sarris
This map shows the geographic impact of Peter Sarris's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Peter Sarris with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Peter Sarris more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Peter Sarris
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Peter Sarris. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Peter Sarris. The network helps show where Peter Sarris may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 6 scholars most cited alongside Peter Sarris, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
Showing the 20 most-cited of 34 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2004 | 115 | |
| 2 | 2002 | 108 | |
| 3 | 2006 | 102 | |
| 4 | 2012 | 48 | |
| 5 | 2011 | 43 | |
| 6 | 2006 | 43 | |
| 7 | 2012 | 34 | |
| 8 | 2011 | 25 | |
| 9 | 2021 | 24 | |
| 10 | 2011 | 16 | |
| 11 | 2005 | 10 | |
| 12 | 2004 | 8 | |
| 13 | 2008 | 7 | |
| 14 | 2006 | 6 | |
| 15 | 2006 | 6 | |
| 16 | 2013 | 5 | |
| 17 | 2020 | 3 | |
| 18 | Journal of Agrarian Change, 9(1). Special Issue: Aristocrats, Peasants and the Transformation of Rural Society, c.400-800. | 2009 | 3 |
| 19 | 2011 | 2 | |
| 20 | 2011 | 2 |
About Peter Sarris
Peter Sarris is a scholar working on Classics, Anthropology, Archeology, History and Genetics, having authored 34 papers that have together received 621 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Byzantine Studies and History (16 papers), Archaeology and Historical Studies (10 papers), Classical Antiquity Studies (9 papers), Medieval Literature and History (5 papers), Eurasian Exchange Networks (5 papers), Historical and Religious Studies of Rome (4 papers), Classical Studies and Legal History (3 papers) and Yersinia bacterium, plague, ectoparasites research (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Classics (283 citations), Anthropology (297 citations), Archeology (252 citations), History (190 citations) and Religious studies (29 citations). Peter Sarris has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, South Sudan and United States. Frequent co-authors include Phil Booth, Marios Costambeys, Warren Brown, Jonathan P. Conant, Matthew Innes and Jairus Banaji. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Agrarian Change, The American Historical Review, Early Medieval Europe, Historical Materialism and Past & Present.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.