Phaik‐Eng Sum

2.2k citations
31 papers · 1.8k · h-index 20

Impact in

    • Antibiotic Resistance in Bacteria
    • Antibiotics Pharmacokinetics and Efficacy
    • Microbial Natural Products and Biosynthesis

Papers in

Phaik‐Eng Sum

31 papers receiving 1.6k citations

Peers

Phaik‐Eng Sum
Comparison fields: 5 of 78
  • Molecular Medicine 658
  • Pharmacology 463
  • Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology 72
  • Infectious Diseases 307
  • Organic Chemistry 325
Replace Joan C. Fung-Tomc with:
Joan C. Fung-Tomc United States
H Kropp United States
Y Osada Japan
Zhengyu Yuan China
Peter Angehrn Switzerland
R. T. TESTA United States
Takafumi Sato Japan
Roberta J. Melander United States
Arthur R. English United States
Kazuki Hoshino Japan
Phaik‐Eng Sum relative to Joan C. Fung-Tomc United States Joan C. Fung-Tomc's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
Joan C. Fung-Tomc · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Phaik‐Eng Sum

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Phaik‐Eng Sum's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Phaik‐Eng Sum with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Phaik‐Eng Sum more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Phaik‐Eng Sum

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Phaik‐Eng Sum. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Phaik‐Eng Sum. The network helps show where Phaik‐Eng Sum may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Phaik‐Eng Sum, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Phaik‐Eng Sum Line = papers co-authored together Phaik‐Eng Sum links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 31 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1999359
2 2003259
3 2002143
4 1999142
5 2007117
6 1993113
7 1994106
8 199679
9 198661
10 197060
11 197842
12 200435
13 200532
14 200330
15 198627
16 197923
17 198223
18 198421
19 200321
20 200921

About Phaik‐Eng Sum

Phaik‐Eng Sum is a scholar working on Pharmacology, Molecular Medicine, Organic Chemistry, Insect Science and Infectious Diseases, having authored 31 papers that have together received 1.8k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Organic Chemistry Synthesis Methods (9 papers), Microbial Natural Products and Biosynthesis (8 papers), Antibiotic Resistance in Bacteria (7 papers), Carbohydrate Chemistry and Synthesis (5 papers), Antimicrobial Resistance in Staphylococcus (5 papers), Insect Pheromone Research and Control (4 papers), Chemical Synthesis and Analysis (4 papers) and Protease and Inhibitor Mechanisms (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Molecular Medicine (658 citations), Pharmacology (463 citations), Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology (72 citations), Infectious Diseases (307 citations) and Organic Chemistry (325 citations). Phaik‐Eng Sum has collaborated with scholars based in Canada, Germany and France. Frequent co-authors include Peter J. Petersen, R. T. TESTA, Steven J. Projan, Nilda V. Jacobus, Patricia A. Bradford, Larry Weiler, Charles R. Dean, Melissa A. Visalli, Francis P. Tally and George A. Ellestad. Their work appears in journals such as Bioorganic & Medicinal Chemistry Letters, Canadian Journal of Chemistry, Journal of Medicinal Chemistry, Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy and Osteoarthritis and Cartilage.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact