Ph. BIBET

47 papers receiving 709 citations

Peers

Ph. BIBET
Comparison fields: 5 of 17
  • Nuclear and High Energy Physics 701
  • Aerospace Engineering 143
  • Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics 89
  • Materials Chemistry 69
  • Statistical and Nonlinear Physics 9
Replace Jorge H.C.M. Belo with:
Jorge H.C.M. Belo France
H. Shidara Japan
G. Berger-By France
K. Yokokura Japan
G. Granucci Italy
Marc Prou France
T. Franke Germany
Magali Zabiégo France
David R. Terry United States
E. H. Fredd United States
Ph. BIBET relative to Jorge H.C.M. Belo France Jorge H.C.M. Belo's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.7×
Jorge H.C.M. Belo · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Ph. BIBET

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Ph. BIBET's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Ph. BIBET with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Ph. BIBET more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Ph. BIBET

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Ph. BIBET. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Ph. BIBET. The network helps show where Ph. BIBET may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Ph. BIBET, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Ph. BIBET Line = papers co-authored together Ph. BIBET links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 48 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1994106
2 199863
3 199560
4 199258
5 200157
6 200549
7 200029
8 200527
9 200527
10 200424
11 200023
12 200021
13 200319
14 200519
15 199716
16 200512
17 200311
18 200510
19 19958
20 20078

About Ph. BIBET

Ph. BIBET is a scholar working on Nuclear and High Energy Physics, Aerospace Engineering, Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics, Materials Chemistry and Statistical and Nonlinear Physics, having authored 48 papers that have together received 749 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Magnetic confinement fusion research (47 papers), Particle accelerators and beam dynamics (22 papers), Gyrotron and Vacuum Electronics Research (6 papers), Fusion materials and technologies (5 papers), Fusion and Plasma Physics Studies (2 papers), Antenna Design and Analysis (1 paper) and Research, Science, and Academia (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Nuclear and High Energy Physics (701 citations), Aerospace Engineering (143 citations), Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics (89 citations), Materials Chemistry (69 citations) and Statistical and Nonlinear Physics (9 citations). Ph. BIBET has collaborated with scholars based in France, Italy and Finland. Frequent co-authors include Didier Moreau, X. Litaudon, Xavier L Litaudon, Marc Goniche, Francesco Mirizzi, Guy Rey, Bertrand Beaumont, Angelo Antonio Tuccillo, J. Mailloux and Ph. Froissard. Their work appears in journals such as Fusion Engineering and Design, Nuclear Fusion, Journal of Nuclear Materials, Plasma Physics and Controlled Fusion and Fusion Science & Technology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact