Peter Watts

1.2k citations
24 papers · 885 · h-index 16

Impact in

Papers in

Peter Watts

23 papers receiving 831 citations

Peers

Peter Watts
Comparison fields: 5 of 110
  • Pharmaceutical Science 425
  • Instrumentation 44
  • Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine 47
  • Biomaterials 120
  • Astronomy and Astrophysics 138
Replace Ross H.M. Hatley with:
Ross H.M. Hatley United Kingdom
Lìyǐng Zhū China
David M. Richards United Kingdom
Gabriele Conti Italy
Akshay Datey India
Marjolein van Heerden Belgium
Harald Berchtold Germany
Jodi L. Miller United Kingdom
Sheila J. Thornton Canada
William R. Kearney United States
Peter Watts relative to Ross H.M. Hatley United Kingdom Ross H.M. Hatley's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×10×20×30×40×46×
Ross H.M. Hatley · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Peter Watts

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Peter Watts's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Peter Watts with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Peter Watts more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Peter Watts

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Peter Watts. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Peter Watts. The network helps show where Peter Watts may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Peter Watts, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Peter Watts Line = papers co-authored together Peter Watts links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 24 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2002216
2 2002114
3 200988
4 201282
5 199941
6 201240
7 200540
8 199639
9 200536
10 201834
11 200526
12 200524
13 200522
14 200317
15 200317
16 200816
17 201613
18 20018
19 20127
20
The League of youth ; A Doll's house ; The Lady from the sea
19652

About Peter Watts

Peter Watts is a scholar working on Astronomy and Astrophysics, Pharmaceutical Science, Molecular Biology, Instrumentation and Statistical and Nonlinear Physics, having authored 24 papers that have together received 885 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Advanced Drug Delivery Systems (8 papers), Galaxies: Formation, Evolution, Phenomena (8 papers), Astronomy and Astrophysical Research (4 papers), Cosmology and Gravitation Theories (3 papers), Inhalation and Respiratory Drug Delivery (2 papers), Pain Management and Opioid Use (2 papers), RNA Interference and Gene Delivery (2 papers) and Advancements in Transdermal Drug Delivery (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Pharmaceutical Science (425 citations), Instrumentation (44 citations), Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine (47 citations), Biomaterials (120 citations) and Astronomy and Astrophysics (138 citations). Peter Watts has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Germany and United States. Frequent co-authors include Alan M. Smith, Inderjit Jabbal‐Gill, Lisbeth Illum, Richard Nankervis, M. Hinchcliffe, Jonathan Castile, R. C. Smith, A.N. Fisher, Peter Schneider and Peter Coles. Their work appears in journals such as Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, Expert Opinion on Drug Delivery, Astronomy and Astrophysics, Biochemical and Biophysical Research Communications and Drug Delivery.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact