Peter W. Hellyer

85 papers receiving 1.9k citations

Peers

Peter W. Hellyer
Comparison fields: 5 of 140
  • Equine 411
  • Small Animals 1.2k
  • Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine 270
  • Speech and Hearing 277
  • Genetics 425
Replace Margaret E. Gruen with:
Margaret E. Gruen United States
Jacqueline Reid United Kingdom
Kate White United Kingdom
Peter Conlon Canada
Penelope Morris United Kingdom
Shelley L. Holden United Kingdom
Sarah Heath United Kingdom
L. D. Young United States
M. Albertini Italy
Alexandra L. Whittaker Australia
Peter W. Hellyer relative to Margaret E. Gruen United States Margaret E. Gruen's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×6.9×
Margaret E. Gruen · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Peter W. Hellyer

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Peter W. Hellyer's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Peter W. Hellyer with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Peter W. Hellyer more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Peter W. Hellyer

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Peter W. Hellyer. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Peter W. Hellyer. The network helps show where Peter W. Hellyer may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Peter W. Hellyer, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Peter W. Hellyer Line = papers co-authored together Peter W. Hellyer links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 86 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2002124
2
Species-specific assessment of pain in laboratory animals.
2003103
3 201077
4 200776
5 200772
6 198865
7 200458
8 200155
9 202047
10 201046
11 199546
12 200145
13 201745
14 199944
15 201943
16 200842
17 201741
18 200540
19 201840
20 200038

About Peter W. Hellyer

Peter W. Hellyer is a scholar working on Small Animals, Genetics, Speech and Hearing, Surgery and Equine, having authored 86 papers that have together received 2.0k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Veterinary Pharmacology and Anesthesia (45 papers), Human-Animal Interaction Studies (24 papers), Veterinary Practice and Education Studies (19 papers), Anesthesia and Pain Management (14 papers), Veterinary Equine Medical Research (14 papers), Pediatric Pain Management Techniques (11 papers), Anesthesia and Sedative Agents (8 papers) and Pharmacological Effects and Assays (7 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Equine (411 citations), Small Animals (1.2k citations), Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine (270 citations), Speech and Hearing (277 citations) and Genetics (425 citations). Peter W. Hellyer has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Canada and Russia. Frequent co-authors include Lori R. Kogan, Ann E. Wagner, Regina Schoenfeld‐Tacher, Khursheed R. Mama, Mark Rishniw, James S. Gaynor, John A. E. Hubbell, Sheilah A. Robertson, William W. Muir and John R. Dodam. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of the American Veterinary Medical Association, American Journal of Veterinary Research, Journal of Veterinary Medical Education, Veterinary Anaesthesia and Analgesia and Frontiers in Veterinary Science.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact