Peter W. de Jong

1.8k citations
63 papers · 1.4k · h-index 24

Impact in

Papers in

Peter W. de Jong

63 papers receiving 1.3k citations

Peers

Peter W. de Jong
Comparison fields: 5 of 62
  • Insect Science 930
  • Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics 674
  • Ecological Modeling 67
  • Ecology 321
  • Plant Science 398
Replace Louis Bernard Klaczko with:
Louis Bernard Klaczko Brazil
Sonja J. Scheffer United States
Paul K. Abram Canada
Luis M. Torres‐Vila Spain
John J. Sloggett Netherlands
Cécile Le Lann France
Julie Jaquiéry France
Wolfgang Arthofer Austria
Andrew A. Forbes United States
Terence L. Wagner United States
Peter W. de Jong relative to Louis Bernard Klaczko Brazil Louis Bernard Klaczko's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×1.9×
Louis Bernard Klaczko · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Peter W. de Jong

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Peter W. de Jong's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Peter W. de Jong with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Peter W. de Jong more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Peter W. de Jong

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Peter W. de Jong. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Peter W. de Jong. The network helps show where Peter W. de Jong may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Peter W. de Jong, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Peter W. de Jong Line = papers co-authored together Peter W. de Jong links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 63 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1996143
2 199173
3 199170
4 201666
5 199850
6 199348
7 201142
8 201138
9 200538
10 201336
11 198936
12 200634
13 200832
14 201731
15 201530
16 202129
17 200527
18 200027
19 201926
20 199326

About Peter W. de Jong

Peter W. de Jong is a scholar working on Insect Science, Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, Ecology, Plant Science and Genetics, having authored 63 papers that have together received 1.4k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Insect-Plant Interactions and Control (47 papers), Plant and animal studies (26 papers), Forest Insect Ecology and Management (15 papers), Insect and Pesticide Research (13 papers), Insect Pest Control Strategies (12 papers), Insect behavior and control techniques (9 papers), Insect Resistance and Genetics (7 papers) and Genetic diversity and population structure (6 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Insect Science (930 citations), Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics (674 citations), Ecological Modeling (67 citations), Ecology (321 citations) and Plant Science (398 citations). Peter W. de Jong has collaborated with scholars based in Netherlands, United Kingdom and Japan. Frequent co-authors include Paul M. Brakefield, Graham J. Holloway, J.C. van Lenteren, Jens Nielsen, Hélène de Vos, Sander W. S. Gussekloo, Suzanne T. E. Lommen, Marcel Dicke, Lia Hemerik and Bart A. Pannebakker. Their work appears in journals such as Entomologia Experimentalis et Applicata, BioControl, Heredity, Biological Control and Evolutionary Ecology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact