Peter Vaupel

35.8k citations
393 papers · 28.2k · 13 hit papers · h-index 68

Impact in

Papers in

Peter Vaupel

388 papers receiving 27.6k citations

Peter Vaupel's Hit Papers

Revisiting the Warburg effect: historical dogma versus current understanding 2020 · 559 citations
5590+12+24Years since publication50010001.5k2.0k2.5k

Peers

Peter Vaupel
Comparison fields: 5 of 173
  • Cancer Research 13.6k
  • Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging 6.0k
  • Oncology 4.8k
  • Biotechnology 1.5k
  • Molecular Biology 10.0k
Replace Jens Overgaard with:
Jens Overgaard Denmark
Mark W. Dewhirst United States
Dai Fukumura United States
Rićhard P. Hill Canada
Ralph R. Weichselbaum United States
Ralph J. DeBerardinis United States
Amato J. Giaccia United States
Lisa M. Coussens United States
Beverly A. Teicher United States
Robert S. Kerbel Canada
Peter Vaupel relative to Jens Overgaard Denmark Jens Overgaard's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
Jens Overgaard · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Peter Vaupel

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Peter Vaupel's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Peter Vaupel with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Peter Vaupel more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Peter Vaupel

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Peter Vaupel. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Peter Vaupel. The network helps show where Peter Vaupel may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Peter Vaupel, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Peter Vaupel Line = papers co-authored together Peter Vaupel links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 393 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1
Blood flow, oxygen and nutrient supply, and metabolic microenvironment of human tumors: a review.
Hit paper breakdown →
19892840
2
Tumor Hypoxia: Definitions and Current Clinical, Biologic, and Molecular Aspects
Hit paper breakdown →
20012152
3
Hypoxia in cancer: significance and impact on clinical outcome
Hit paper breakdown →
20071784
4
Association between tumor hypoxia and malignant progression in advanced cancer of the uterine cervix.
Hit paper breakdown →
19961491
5
Oxygenation of human tumors: evaluation of tissue oxygen distribution in breast cancers by computerized O2 tension measurements.
Hit paper breakdown →
1991828
6
ESPEN expert group recommendations for action against cancer-related malnutrition
Hit paper breakdown →
2017811
7
Tumor microenvironmental physiology and its implications for radiation oncology
Hit paper breakdown →
2004756
8
Intratumoral pO2 predicts survival in advanced cancer of the uterine cervix
Hit paper breakdown →
1993673
9
The Role of Hypoxia-Induced Factors in Tumor Progression
Hit paper breakdown →
2004663
10
The Warburg effect: essential part of metabolic reprogramming and central contributor to cancer progression
Hit paper breakdown →
2019645
11
Tumor Hypoxia: Causative Factors, Compensatory Mechanisms, and Cellular Response
Hit paper breakdown →
2004605
12
Detection and Characterization of Tumor Hypoxia Using pO 2 Histography
Hit paper breakdown →
2007581
13
Revisiting the Warburg effect: historical dogma versus current understanding
Hit paper breakdown →
2020559
14 2001452
15 2001386
16 2004385
17
Oxygenation of carcinomas of the uterine cervix: evaluation by computerized O2 tension measurements.
1991306
18 2008305
19
Heterogeneous oxygen partial pressure and pH distribution in C3H mouse mammary adenocarcinoma.
1981301
20
Hypoxic cervical cancers with low apoptotic index are highly aggressive.
1999282

About Peter Vaupel

Peter Vaupel is a scholar working on Cancer Research, Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging, Biomedical Engineering, Molecular Biology and Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine, having authored 393 papers that have together received 28.2k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Cancer, Hypoxia, and Metabolism (213 papers), Ultrasound and Hyperthermia Applications (68 papers), Medical Imaging Techniques and Applications (43 papers), Advanced MRI Techniques and Applications (40 papers), Nanoplatforms for cancer theranostics (32 papers), MRI in cancer diagnosis (29 papers), Hemoglobin structure and function (25 papers) and Photoacoustic and Ultrasonic Imaging (24 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Cancer Research (13.6k citations), Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging (6.0k citations), Oncology (4.8k citations), Biotechnology (1.5k citations) and Molecular Biology (10.0k citations). Peter Vaupel has collaborated with scholars based in Germany, United States and Czechia. Frequent co-authors include Michael Höckel, Arnulf Mayer, F. Kallinowski, Paul Okunieff, Karlheinz Schlenger, Gabriele Multhoff, Oliver Thews, M. Mitze, Uwe Schäffer and Louis B. Harrison. Their work appears in journals such as Advances in experimental medicine and biology, International Journal of Hyperthermia, Strahlentherapie und Onkologie, International Journal of Radiation Oncology*Biology*Physics and British Journal of Cancer.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact