Peter Van Ness

622 citations
43 papers · 240 · h-index 9

Impact in

Papers in

Peter Van Ness

36 papers receiving 157 citations

Peers

Peter Van Ness
Comparison fields: 5 of 51
  • Development 49
  • Political Science and International Relations 147
  • Sociology and Political Science 144
  • History 18
  • Cultural Studies 11
Replace Saul H. Mendlovitz with:
Saul H. Mendlovitz United States
John Samuel Fitch United States
Alain Rouquié France
Pauline Kerr Australia
Geoffrey Wiseman United States
Nigel Clive United Kingdom
Alexis Heraclides Greece
Margot Light United Kingdom
William J. Durch United States
Peter Lambert United Kingdom
Peter Van Ness relative to Saul H. Mendlovitz United States Saul H. Mendlovitz's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×
Saul H. Mendlovitz · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Peter Van Ness

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Peter Van Ness's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Peter Van Ness with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Peter Van Ness more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Peter Van Ness

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Peter Van Ness. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Peter Van Ness. The network helps show where Peter Van Ness may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Peter Van Ness, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Peter Van Ness Line = papers co-authored together Peter Van Ness links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 43 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1
Debating Human Rights: Critical Essays from the United States and Asia
200327
2 197126
3 197324
4 200223
5 197120
6 197717
7 197916
8
Debating Human Rights
20038
9 20038
10
Australia's human rights diplomacy
19927
11 20056
12 19706
13 19994
14 19924
15 20084
16 19703
17 19743
18 19982
19 20172
20 19722

About Peter Van Ness

Peter Van Ness is a scholar working on Sociology and Political Science, Political Science and International Relations, History, Astronomy and Astrophysics and Safety, Risk, Reliability and Quality, having authored 43 papers that have together received 240 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include International Relations and Foreign Policy (8 papers), Korean Peninsula Historical and Political Studies (6 papers), Global Peace and Security Dynamics (4 papers), Nuclear Issues and Defense (3 papers), China's Socioeconomic Reforms and Governance (3 papers), Chinese history and philosophy (3 papers), Historical and Contemporary Political Dynamics (3 papers) and Nuclear and radioactivity studies (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Development (49 citations), Political Science and International Relations (147 citations), Sociology and Political Science (144 citations), History (18 citations) and Cultural Studies (11 citations). Peter Van Ness has collaborated with scholars based in Australia, United States and China. Frequent co-authors include Edgar Wickberg, John Gittings, Harold C. Hinton, Beng Huat Chua, I.F. Russell, John F. Copper, Yuan-li Wu, William Diebold, John G. Stoessinger and Allen S. Whiting. Their work appears in journals such as The American Historical Review, The China Journal, Pacific Affairs, International Relations of the Asia-Pacific and Contemporary Southeast Asia.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact