Contemporary Southeast Asia

1.2k papers and 9.3k indexed citations i.

About

The 1.2k papers published in Contemporary Southeast Asia in the last decades have received a total of 9.3k indexed citations. Papers published in Contemporary Southeast Asia usually cover Political Science and International Relations (596 papers), Sociology and Political Science (591 papers) and General Economics, Econometrics and Finance (142 papers) specifically the topics of Asian Studies and History (283 papers), Asian Geopolitics and Ethnography (230 papers) and Southeast Asian Sociopolitical Studies (198 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Contemporary Southeast Asia are Willy Wo-Lap Lam, Daromir Rudnyckyj, Ron Huisken, Denny Roy, Zachary Abuza, Marcus Mietzner, Ashley South, Carlyle A. Thayer, M. Taylor Fravel and John Funston.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Contemporary Southeast Asia

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Contemporary Southeast Asia. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Contemporary Southeast Asia.

Countries where authors publish in Contemporary Southeast Asia

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Contemporary Southeast Asia. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Contemporary Southeast Asia with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Contemporary Southeast Asia more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025