Peter T. Struck

641 citations
14 papers · 134 · h-index 5

Impact in

    • Classical Antiquity Studies
    • Historical and Literary Studies
  • Archeology top 5%
    • Historical, Religious, and Philosophical Studies

Papers in

    • Historical, Religious, and Philosophical Studies 7
    • Classical Philosophy and Thought 6
    • Kantian Philosophy and Modern Interpretations 1

Peter T. Struck

10 papers receiving 89 citations

Peers

Peter T. Struck
Comparison fields: 5 of 31
  • Anthropology 71
  • Archeology 58
  • Philosophy 60
  • Religious studies 17
  • Classics 7
Replace Deborah Levine Gera with:
Deborah Levine Gera Israel
George Boys‐Stones United Kingdom
Silvia Montiglio United States
Bruce Heiden United States
Carl Joachim Classen Germany
Thorsten Fögen Germany
Eva Stehle United States
Luc Brisson France
Louise Pratt United States
David Bain United Kingdom
Peter T. Struck relative to Deborah Levine Gera Israel Deborah Levine Gera's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×1.9×
Deborah Levine Gera · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Peter T. Struck

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Peter T. Struck's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Peter T. Struck with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Peter T. Struck more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Peter T. Struck

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Peter T. Struck. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Peter T. Struck. The network helps show where Peter T. Struck may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 2 scholars most cited alongside Peter T. Struck, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Peter T. Struck Line = papers co-authored together Peter T. Struck links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

14 of 14 papers shown
#Work
1 200571
2 200429
3 201610
4 20166
5 20145
6
Mantike: Studies in Ancient Divination
20154
7 20163
8
Die Schule der Zukunft: von der Belehrungsanstalt zur Lernwerkstatt
19962
9
Erziehung von gestern Schüler von heute Schule von morgen
19971
10 20141
11 19871
12 20041
13 20160
14
Iamblichus on Divination: Divine Power and Human Intuition
20170

About Peter T. Struck

Peter T. Struck is a scholar working on Archeology, Philosophy, Anthropology, Sociology and Political Science and Astronomy and Astrophysics, having authored 14 papers that have together received 134 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Historical, Religious, and Philosophical Studies (7 papers), Classical Antiquity Studies (6 papers), Classical Philosophy and Thought (6 papers), Sociology and Education Studies (2 papers), Education Methods and Technologies (1 paper), Kantian Philosophy and Modern Interpretations (1 paper), Byzantine Studies and History (1 paper) and Biblical Studies and Interpretation (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Anthropology (71 citations), Archeology (58 citations), Philosophy (60 citations), Religious studies (17 citations) and Classics (7 citations). Peter T. Struck has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include Derek Collins and Sarah Iles Johnston. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of the History of Ideas, The Journal of Roman Studies, The Classical World, Archiv für Religionsgeschichte and Kant-Studien.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact