Peter Studer
Impact in
- Hepatology top 5%
- Liver physiology and pathology
- Surgery top 10%
- Pancreatic function and diabetes
- Organ Transplantation Techniques and Outcomes
Papers in
- Surgery 26
- Organ Transplantation Techniques and Outcomes 7
- Pancreatic function and diabetes 4
- Epidemiology 12
- Co-authors
- Daniel Candinas (17 shared papers)Daniel Inderbitzin (14 shared papers)Mariella Ravazzola (3 shared papers)F Malaisse-Lagae (3 shared papers)Lelio Orci (3 shared papers)D. Baetens (2 shared papers)Beat Schnüriger (5 shared papers)M Amherdt (2 shared papers)
- Journals
- World Journal of Surgery (5 papers)Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery (3 papers)Clinical Epigenetics (1 paper)International Journal of Surgery (1 paper)The American Surgeon (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- SwitzerlandUnited StatesGermany
In The Last Decade
Peter Studer
43 papers receiving 914 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 81
- Hepatology 138
- Surgery 531
- Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism 194
- Oncology 197
- Cancer Research 104
Countries citing papers authored by Peter Studer
This map shows the geographic impact of Peter Studer's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Peter Studer with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Peter Studer more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Peter Studer
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Peter Studer. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Peter Studer. The network helps show where Peter Studer may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Peter Studer, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
Showing the 20 most-cited of 44 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1976 | 189 | |
| 2 | 1978 | 67 | |
| 3 | 2012 | 64 | |
| 4 | 2018 | 60 | |
| 5 | 2015 | 53 | |
| 6 | 2018 | 46 | |
| 7 | 2007 | 40 | |
| 8 | 2009 | 39 | |
| 9 | 2006 | 32 | |
| 10 | 2016 | 30 | |
| 11 | 2011 | 29 | |
| 12 | 2010 | 25 | |
| 13 | 2012 | 25 | |
| 14 | 2009 | 23 | |
| 15 | 1974 | 20 | |
| 16 | 2017 | 17 | |
| 17 | 2009 | 17 | |
| 18 | 2007 | 16 | |
| 19 | 2020 | 16 | |
| 20 | 2015 | 15 |
About Peter Studer
Peter Studer is a scholar working on Surgery, Epidemiology, Hepatology, Oncology and Molecular Biology, having authored 44 papers that have together received 957 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Liver physiology and pathology (8 papers), Organ Transplantation Techniques and Outcomes (7 papers), Colorectal Cancer Surgical Treatments (5 papers), Cardiac, Anesthesia and Surgical Outcomes (4 papers), Pancreatic function and diabetes (4 papers), Colorectal Cancer Screening and Detection (4 papers), Hepatocellular Carcinoma Treatment and Prognosis (3 papers) and Tuberculosis Research and Epidemiology (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Hepatology (138 citations), Surgery (531 citations), Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism (194 citations), Oncology (197 citations) and Cancer Research (104 citations). Peter Studer has collaborated with scholars based in Switzerland, United States and Germany. Frequent co-authors include Daniel Candinas, Daniel Inderbitzin, Mariella Ravazzola, F Malaisse-Lagae, Lelio Orci, D. Baetens, Beat Schnüriger, M Amherdt, C. Rufener and R H Unger. Their work appears in journals such as World Journal of Surgery, Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Clinical Epigenetics, International Journal of Surgery and The American Surgeon.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.