Peter Stippl

659 citations
18 papers · 361 · h-index 9

Impact in

    • Digital Mental Health Interventions
    • COVID-19 and Mental Health
    • Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Research
    • Psychotherapy Techniques and Applications

Papers in

Peter Stippl

16 papers receiving 343 citations

Peers

Peter Stippl
Comparison fields: 5 of 61
  • Applied Psychology 137
  • Clinical Psychology 219
  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health 109
  • Social Psychology 55
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 30
Replace Milou A. Feijt with:
Milou A. Feijt Netherlands
Nathan Culmer United States
Nelle Williams United States
Andrea Jesser Austria
Sonia Terhaag Australia
Alison O’Daffer United States
Fanny Kählke Germany
Davor Mucić United States
Shaun Liverpool United Kingdom
Nitya Kanuri United States
Peter Stippl relative to Milou A. Feijt Netherlands Milou A. Feijt's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.4×
Milou A. Feijt · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Peter Stippl

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Peter Stippl's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Peter Stippl with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Peter Stippl more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Peter Stippl

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Peter Stippl. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Peter Stippl. The network helps show where Peter Stippl may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 20 scholars most cited alongside Peter Stippl, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Peter Stippl Line = papers co-authored together Peter Stippl links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

18 of 18 papers shown
#Work
1 202073
2 202061
3 202146
4 202040
5 202135
6 202122
7 202021
8 202018
9 202211
10 20218
11 20227
12 20236
13 20205
14 20224
15 20213
16 20211
17 20170
18 20250

About Peter Stippl

Peter Stippl is a scholar working on Clinical Psychology, Applied Psychology, Social Psychology, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health and Neurology, having authored 18 papers that have together received 361 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include COVID-19 and Mental Health (11 papers), Digital Mental Health Interventions (10 papers), Telemedicine and Telehealth Implementation (5 papers), Long-Term Effects of COVID-19 (2 papers), Mental Health Treatment and Access (2 papers), Health Policy Implementation Science (1 paper), Psychological Well-being and Life Satisfaction (1 paper) and Healthcare professionals’ stress and burnout (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Applied Psychology (137 citations), Clinical Psychology (219 citations), Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health (109 citations), Social Psychology (55 citations) and Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (30 citations). Peter Stippl has collaborated with scholars based in Austria, Germany and Belgium. Frequent co-authors include Thomas Probst, Christoph Pieh, Elke Humer, Rüdiger Pryss, Sanja Budimir, Rachel Dale, Andrea Jesser, Antonia Barke, Bettina K. Doering and Gerald Gartlehner. Their work appears in journals such as International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, Journal of Medical Internet Research, Life, Frontiers in Psychology and Clinical Psychology & Psychotherapy.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact