Nathan Culmer

10 papers receiving 340 citations

Peers

Nathan Culmer
Comparison fields: 5 of 54
  • Applied Psychology 122
  • Clinical Psychology 114
  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health 121
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 31
  • General Health Professions 47
Replace Nelle Williams with:
Nelle Williams United States
Jack D. Watson United States
Wei-Jean Chung United States
Alison O’Daffer United States
Sonia Terhaag Australia
Alison Quinlan Canada
Dale Dirkse Canada
Sophie Adams Australia
Davor Mucić United States
Janyce E. Osenbach United States
Nathan Culmer relative to Nelle Williams United States Nelle Williams's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×1.9×
Nelle Williams · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Nathan Culmer

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Nathan Culmer's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Nathan Culmer with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Nathan Culmer more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Nathan Culmer

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Nathan Culmer. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Nathan Culmer. The network helps show where Nathan Culmer may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 17 scholars most cited alongside Nathan Culmer, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Nathan Culmer Line = papers co-authored together Nathan Culmer links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

12 of 12 papers shown
#Work
1 2018191
2 201894
3 202029
4 202112
5 201910
6 20238
7 20243
8 20243
9 20241
10 20241
11 20250
12 20240

About Nathan Culmer

Nathan Culmer is a scholar working on Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, General Health Professions, History and Philosophy of Science, Clinical Psychology and Applied Psychology, having authored 12 papers that have together received 352 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Telemedicine and Telehealth Implementation (2 papers), Digital Mental Health Interventions (1 paper), Family and Disability Support Research (1 paper), Trauma and Emergency Care Studies (1 paper), Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development (1 paper), Asthma and respiratory diseases (1 paper), Health and Medical Research Impacts (1 paper) and Innovations in Medical Education (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Applied Psychology (122 citations), Clinical Psychology (114 citations), Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health (121 citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (31 citations) and General Health Professions (47 citations). Nathan Culmer has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include Nelle Williams, Michael King, Anne Halli-Tierney, Hannah Roberts, M. Blake Berryhill, T Smith, Andrea Wright, Katherine Grimm, Laura M. Hopson and Catherine Carlson. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Dental Education, The Journal of the American Dental Association, The Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology In Practice, Journal of Public Health Dentistry and Telemedicine Journal and e-Health.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact