Peter Steinmetz

12 papers receiving 283 citations

Peers

Peter Steinmetz
Comparison fields: 5 of 44
  • Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine 192
  • Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging 71
  • Neurology 44
  • Family Practice 5
  • Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 39
Replace John L. Ritter with:
John L. Ritter United States
Ernie G Butler Australia
Domagoj Damjanović Germany
Michael De Georgia United States
Francisco Lobo Portugal
Robert Spencer United Kingdom
Mark Marieb United States
R. Thomas United Kingdom
Corey M. Mossop United States
Frank Rasulo United States
Peter Steinmetz relative to John L. Ritter United States John L. Ritter's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×10.7×
John L. Ritter · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Peter Steinmetz

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Peter Steinmetz's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Peter Steinmetz with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Peter Steinmetz more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Peter Steinmetz

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Peter Steinmetz. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Peter Steinmetz. The network helps show where Peter Steinmetz may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 24 scholars most cited alongside Peter Steinmetz, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Peter Steinmetz Line = papers co-authored together Peter Steinmetz links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

12 of 12 papers shown
#Work
1 201654
2 200753
3 202038
4 201634
5
The benefits of doing ultrasound exams in your office.
201626
6
Canadian national survey of point-of-care ultrasound training in family medicine residency programs.
201824
7 201815
8 201513
9
Canadian national survey of family medicine residents on point-of-care ultrasound training.
201913
10 201811
11 20217
12
Animal models: some empirical worries.
19942

About Peter Steinmetz

Peter Steinmetz is a scholar working on Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine, Surgery, Small Animals, Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience and Neurology, having authored 12 papers that have together received 290 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Ultrasound in Clinical Applications (8 papers), Neuroscience and Neural Engineering (1 paper), Surgical Simulation and Training (1 paper), Neurological disorders and treatments (1 paper), Emergency and Acute Care Studies (1 paper), Anatomy and Medical Technology (1 paper), Soft Robotics and Applications (1 paper) and Parkinson's Disease Mechanisms and Treatments (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine (192 citations), Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging (71 citations), Neurology (44 citations), Family Practice (5 citations) and Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (39 citations). Peter Steinmetz has collaborated with scholars based in Canada, United States and Uganda. Frequent co-authors include Sharon Oleskevich, Stamatios N. Sotiropoulos, Alina Dyachenko, David Braganza, Kyle Sue, Michael Y. Woo, Andrew Reid, Peter Rogers, Geoffroy Noël and Jeffrey W. Hall. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Ultrasound in Medicine, Journal of Telemedicine and Telecare, Journal of Neural Engineering, Medical Science Educator and PubMed.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact