Peter Smyth

864 citations
26 papers · 708 · h-index 13

Impact in

Papers in

Peter Smyth

24 papers receiving 701 citations

Peers

Peter Smyth
Comparison fields: 5 of 111
  • Biomaterials 163
  • Immunology 114
  • Molecular Medicine 27
  • Molecular Biology 315
  • Pharmaceutical Science 26
Replace Seiichi Tada with:
Seiichi Tada Japan
Nehal E. Elsadek Egypt
Qingling Song China
Margit Maria Janat-Amsbury United States
Hao Cai China
Hirohito Ayame Japan
Tarmo Mölder Estonia
Kristin N. Bauer Germany
Cristina Monfardini United States
Peter Smyth relative to Seiichi Tada Japan Seiichi Tada's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×2.5×
Seiichi Tada · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Peter Smyth

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Peter Smyth's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Peter Smyth with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Peter Smyth more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Peter Smyth

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Peter Smyth. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Peter Smyth. The network helps show where Peter Smyth may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Peter Smyth, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Peter Smyth Line = papers co-authored together Peter Smyth links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 26 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2015159
2 202293
3 201792
4 201862
5 201952
6 202034
7 201928
8 202124
9 202024
10 202023
11 202019
12 202317
13 201814
14 201813
15 199211
16 20219
17 19928
18
“I miss being spoon-fed”. A comparison of transition from school to university education from the perspective of undergraduate pharmacy students
20147
19 20186
20 19965

About Peter Smyth

Peter Smyth is a scholar working on Biomaterials, Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging, Inorganic Chemistry, Molecular Biology and Ophthalmology, having authored 26 papers that have together received 708 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Nanoparticle-Based Drug Delivery (6 papers), Cell death mechanisms and regulation (3 papers), Radioactive element chemistry and processing (3 papers), Advanced Polymer Synthesis and Characterization (3 papers), Radiopharmaceutical Chemistry and Applications (2 papers), Protease and Inhibitor Mechanisms (2 papers), Monoclonal and Polyclonal Antibodies Research (2 papers) and Extraction and Separation Processes (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Biomaterials (163 citations), Immunology (114 citations), Molecular Medicine (27 citations), Molecular Biology (315 citations) and Pharmaceutical Science (26 citations). Peter Smyth has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and France. Frequent co-authors include Christopher J. Scott, Michelle K. Greene, Richard D. Williams, Daniel B. Longley, Katrina Campbell, Marcos Fernández, Daniel Ashley Richards, Vijay Chudasama, Tamas Sessler and Efrosyni Themistou. Their work appears in journals such as Nanoscale, Journal of Controlled Release, Molecular Aspects of Medicine, Archives of Biochemistry and Biophysics and FEBS Journal.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact