Peter Schleier

29 papers receiving 426 citations

Peers

Peter Schleier
Comparison fields: 5 of 71
  • Oral Surgery 121
  • Immunology and Allergy 28
  • Rheumatology 67
  • Urology 25
  • Otorhinolaryngology 16
Replace Po‐Cheung Kwan with:
Po‐Cheung Kwan Taiwan
Anita Gohel United States
Kenichi Kumagai Japan
Aline Corrêa Abrahão Brazil
Xinyuan Zhao China
Liangjia Bi China
Carolina Fávaro Francisconi Brazil
Yasuto Yoshihama Japan
Ming Yung Chou Taiwan
Runzhi Deng China
Peter Schleier relative to Po‐Cheung Kwan Taiwan Po‐Cheung Kwan's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2.8×
Po‐Cheung Kwan · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Peter Schleier

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Peter Schleier's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Peter Schleier with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Peter Schleier more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Peter Schleier

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Peter Schleier. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Peter Schleier. The network helps show where Peter Schleier may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Peter Schleier, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Peter Schleier Line = papers co-authored together Peter Schleier links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 29 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 200570
2 200645
3 200732
4 200830
5 200530
6 200621
7 200420
8 200719
9 200819
10 200618
11 200518
12
Treatment options in distraction osteogenesis therapy using a new bidirectional distractor system.
200717
13 200613
14 199913
15 201113
16 201312
17 200210
18 20179
19 20037
20 20065

About Peter Schleier

Peter Schleier is a scholar working on Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine, Surgery, Oncology, Genetics and Oral Surgery, having authored 29 papers that have together received 444 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Photodynamic Therapy Research Studies (7 papers), Craniofacial Disorders and Treatments (4 papers), Cell Adhesion Molecules Research (3 papers), Dental Implant Techniques and Outcomes (2 papers), Bone Tumor Diagnosis and Treatments (2 papers), Cancer Research and Treatments (2 papers), Bone health and treatments (2 papers) and Nonmelanoma Skin Cancer Studies (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Oral Surgery (121 citations), Immunology and Allergy (28 citations), Rheumatology (67 citations), Urology (25 citations) and Otorhinolaryngology (16 citations). Peter Schleier has collaborated with scholars based in Germany, France and United States. Frequent co-authors include Peter Hyckel, Alexander Berndt, Hartwig Kosmehl, Martin Freilich, W. Dietel, Joachim H. Clement, W. Pfister, Hartmut Peters, Volkmar Beensen and Dieter Schumann. Their work appears in journals such as Clinical Oral Implants Research, Journal of Cranio-Maxillofacial Surgery, Histochemistry and Cell Biology, Journal of Photochemistry and Photobiology B Biology and Medical Microbiology and Immunology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact