Peter Schausberger
Impact in
- Insect Science top 0.1%
- Insect-Plant Interactions and Control
- Insect symbiosis and bacterial influences
-
- Study of Mite Species
- Animal Behavior and Reproduction
Papers in
-
- Insect-Plant Interactions and Control 79
- Insect symbiosis and bacterial influences 2
-
- Animal Behavior and Reproduction 52
- Study of Mite Species 39
- Co-authors
- Andreas Walzer (28 shared papers)Brian A. Croft (9 shared papers)Daniela Hoffmann (12 shared papers)Rachid Hanna (10 shared papers)Manoel G. C. Gondim (6 shared papers)Gilberto José de Moraes (6 shared papers)Horst Vierheilig C (4 shared papers)Simone Jürschik (1 shared paper)
In The Last Decade
Peter Schausberger
127 papers receiving 3.7k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 62
- Insect Science 2.7k
- Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics 2.2k
- Aging 13
- Plant Science 315
- Ecology 152
Countries citing papers authored by Peter Schausberger
This map shows the geographic impact of Peter Schausberger's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Peter Schausberger with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Peter Schausberger more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Peter Schausberger
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Peter Schausberger. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Peter Schausberger. The network helps show where Peter Schausberger may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Peter Schausberger, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
Showing the 20 most-cited of 128 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2003 | 141 | |
| 2 | 1997 | 138 | |
| 3 | 2011 | 136 | |
| 4 | 2001 | 129 | |
| 5 | 1999 | 124 | |
| 6 | 2007 | 118 | |
| 7 | 2000 | 111 | |
| 8 | 2001 | 110 | |
| 9 | 2008 | 85 | |
| 10 | 2016 | 82 | |
| 11 | 2000 | 75 | |
| 12 | 1999 | 73 | |
| 13 | 2006 | 73 | |
| 14 | 2007 | 70 | |
| 15 | 2001 | 65 | |
| 16 | 1999 | 58 | |
| 17 | 2007 | 56 | |
| 18 | 2010 | 55 | |
| 19 | 1999 | 53 | |
| 20 | 2007 | 53 |
About Peter Schausberger
Peter Schausberger is a scholar working on Insect Science, Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, Genetics, Plant Science and Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience, having authored 128 papers that have together received 3.9k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Insect-Plant Interactions and Control (79 papers), Animal Behavior and Reproduction (52 papers), Study of Mite Species (39 papers), Mycorrhizal Fungi and Plant Interactions (4 papers), Insect and Arachnid Ecology and Behavior (4 papers), Neurobiology and Insect Physiology Research (3 papers), Physiological and biochemical adaptations (3 papers) and Insect symbiosis and bacterial influences (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Insect Science (2.7k citations), Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics (2.2k citations), Aging (13 citations), Plant Science (315 citations) and Ecology (152 citations). Peter Schausberger has collaborated with scholars based in Austria, Japan and Benin. Frequent co-authors include Andreas Walzer, Brian A. Croft, Daniela Hoffmann, Rachid Hanna, Manoel G. C. Gondim, Gilberto José de Moraes, Horst Vierheilig C, Simone Jürschik, Michael Seiter and Hannes F. Paulus. Their work appears in journals such as Experimental and Applied Acarology, PLoS ONE, Animal Behaviour, Biological Control and Scientific Reports.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.