Peter Scarfe

579 citations
30 papers · 381 · h-index 11

Impact in

Papers in

Peter Scarfe

28 papers receiving 374 citations

Peers

Peter Scarfe
Comparison fields: 5 of 91
  • Human-Computer Interaction 96
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 199
  • Health Informatics 14
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 56
  • Media Technology 38
Replace Ryoichi Nakashima with:
Ryoichi Nakashima Japan
Nicolas Martin France
Jacqueline M. Fulvio United States
Won-Du Chang South Korea
Steven A. Cholewiak United States
Shun‐nan Yang United States
S. Ghebreab Netherlands
Masataka Sawayama Japan
Marc Winterbottom United States
Shogo Fukushima Japan
Peter Scarfe relative to Ryoichi Nakashima Japan Ryoichi Nakashima's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×7.6×
Ryoichi Nakashima · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Peter Scarfe

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Peter Scarfe's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Peter Scarfe with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Peter Scarfe more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Peter Scarfe

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Peter Scarfe. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Peter Scarfe. The network helps show where Peter Scarfe may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 19 scholars most cited alongside Peter Scarfe, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Peter Scarfe Line = papers co-authored together Peter Scarfe links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 30 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 201552
2 201948
3 201134
4 202429
5 202228
6 202028
7 200523
8 201521
9 202017
10 200617
11 201116
12 202310
13 201010
14 20229
15 20137
16 20125
17 20215
18 20144
19 20154
20 20162

About Peter Scarfe

Peter Scarfe is a scholar working on Cognitive Neuroscience, Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics, Social Psychology, Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition and Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, having authored 30 papers that have together received 381 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Visual perception and processing mechanisms (23 papers), Color Science and Applications (7 papers), Color perception and design (5 papers), Virtual Reality Applications and Impacts (4 papers), Multisensory perception and integration (4 papers), Ophthalmology and Visual Impairment Studies (3 papers), Olfactory and Sensory Function Studies (3 papers) and Visual Attention and Saliency Detection (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Human-Computer Interaction (96 citations), Cognitive Neuroscience (199 citations), Health Informatics (14 citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (56 citations) and Media Technology (38 citations). Peter Scarfe has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Australia and Germany. Frequent co-authors include Andrew Glennerster, Paul B. Hibbard, Alan Johnston, Loes van Dam, Euan Lindsay, Alasdair D. F. Clarke, Etienne B. Roesch, David T. Field, Ying Zheng and Teresa Tavassoli. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Vision, Vision Research, PLoS ONE, Behavior Research Methods and PLoS Computational Biology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact