Peter S. MacWilliams

32 papers receiving 469 citations

Peers

Peter S. MacWilliams
Comparison fields: 5 of 98
  • Equine 32
  • Small Animals 96
  • Microbiology 36
  • Urology 33
  • Parasitology 35
Replace Fumihito Ohashi with:
Fumihito Ohashi Japan
Rod A.W. Rosychuk United States
Noboru Machida Japan
Tetsuya NAKADE Japan
Yasuho TAURA Japan
Yoshihide SASAKI Japan
Richard L. Torbeck United States
S. E. Turnquist United States
Geoffrey K. Saunders United States
Claire Gay France
Peter S. MacWilliams relative to Fumihito Ohashi Japan Fumihito Ohashi's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2×2.3×
Fumihito Ohashi · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Peter S. MacWilliams

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Peter S. MacWilliams's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Peter S. MacWilliams with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Peter S. MacWilliams more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Peter S. MacWilliams

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Peter S. MacWilliams. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Peter S. MacWilliams. The network helps show where Peter S. MacWilliams may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Peter S. MacWilliams, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Peter S. MacWilliams Line = papers co-authored together Peter S. MacWilliams links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 32 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 200354
2 199849
3 200348
4 197041
5 199434
6 200430
7 200827
8 199424
9 199619
10 198318
11 199215
12 199815
13 198214
14 199814
15
Diagnosis and successful treatment of Cryptococcus neoformans variety grubii in a domestic ferret.
200614
16 199313
17 198312
18 198712
19 199011
20 19839

About Peter S. MacWilliams

Peter S. MacWilliams is a scholar working on Small Animals, Parasitology, Immunology, Nephrology and Epidemiology, having authored 32 papers that have together received 531 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Immune Response and Inflammation (4 papers), Renal function and acid-base balance (3 papers), Veterinary Oncology Research (3 papers), Fungal Infections and Studies (2 papers), Veterinary Practice and Education Studies (2 papers), Viral Infections and Vectors (2 papers), Amphibian and Reptile Biology (2 papers) and Vector-Borne Animal Diseases (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Equine (32 citations), Small Animals (96 citations), Microbiology (36 citations), Urology (33 citations) and Parasitology (35 citations). Peter S. MacWilliams has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Germany and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Kristen R. Friedrichs, Yelva L. Lynfield, Charles J. Czuprynski, Colin R. E. Jefcoate, David G. Wilson, Kent A. Gossett, Renata Jaskula‐Sztul, Noé Galván, Mark D. Markel and Benjamin J. Darien. Their work appears in journals such as American Journal of Veterinary Research, Veterinary Clinical Pathology, Shock, Journal of the American Veterinary Medical Association and Toxicology and Applied Pharmacology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact