Peter Rot

584 citations
14 papers · 387 · h-index 8

Impact in

Papers in

Peter Rot

13 papers receiving 379 citations

Peers

Peter Rot
Comparison fields: 5 of 47
  • Signal Processing 215
  • Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition 245
  • Ophthalmology 57
  • Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging 97
  • Human-Computer Interaction 26
Replace M. Aurangzeb Khan with:
M. Aurangzeb Khan Pakistan
Caiyong Wang China
Ricardo Santos Portugal
Sílvio Filipe Portugal
Hyeon Chang Lee South Korea
Dong Seop Kim South Korea
Raghavender Jillela United States
Abhishek Gangwar India
Kiran B. Raja Norway
Craig Belcher United States
Peter Rot relative to M. Aurangzeb Khan Pakistan M. Aurangzeb Khan's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.3×
M. Aurangzeb Khan · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Peter Rot

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Peter Rot's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Peter Rot with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Peter Rot more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Peter Rot

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Peter Rot. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Peter Rot. The network helps show where Peter Rot may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 18 scholars most cited alongside Peter Rot, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Peter Rot Line = papers co-authored together Peter Rot links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

14 of 14 papers shown
#Work
1 2021128
2 201844
3 202040
4 201937
5 202034
6 201733
7 202026
8 201825
9 20237
10
Privacy Evaluation Protocols for the Evaluation of Soft-Biometric Privacy-Enhancing Technologies
20205
11 20195
12 20242
13 20221
14 20240

About Peter Rot

Peter Rot is a scholar working on Signal Processing, Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, Artificial Intelligence, Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging and Ophthalmology, having authored 14 papers that have together received 387 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Biometric Identification and Security (11 papers), Face recognition and analysis (7 papers), Retinal Imaging and Analysis (5 papers), Glaucoma and retinal disorders (3 papers), Adversarial Robustness in Machine Learning (2 papers), Ocular Disorders and Treatments (2 papers), Face and Expression Recognition (2 papers) and Privacy-Preserving Technologies in Data (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Signal Processing (215 citations), Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (245 citations), Ophthalmology (57 citations), Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging (97 citations) and Human-Computer Interaction (26 citations). Peter Rot has collaborated with scholars based in Slovenia, Germany and Spain. Frequent co-authors include Vitomir Štruc, Peter Peer, Žiga Emeršič, Naser Damer, Philipp Terhörst, Arjan Kuijper, Blaž Meden, Walter J. Scheirer, Arun Ross and Klemen Grm. Their work appears in journals such as Advances in computer vision and pattern recognition, Neural Computing and Applications, IEEE Access, IEEE Transactions on Dependable and Secure Computing and IEEE Transactions on Information Forensics and Security.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact