Peter Rappoport

883 citations
13 papers · 511 · h-index 6

Impact in

Papers in

Peter Rappoport

11 papers receiving 415 citations

Peers

Peter Rappoport
Comparison fields: 5 of 62
  • General Economics, Econometrics and Finance 251
  • Economics and Econometrics 374
  • Finance 116
  • General Decision Sciences 19
  • Accounting 40
Replace Sumru Altuğ with:
Sumru Altuğ Türkiye
G. V. L. Narasimham United States
Edward S. Knotek United States
Lorenzo Pozzi Belgium
Glenn A. Mills United Kingdom
Emiliano Santoro Denmark
Stephen K. Layson United States
Viet Hoang Nguyen Australia
William T. Smith United States
Jim Malley United Kingdom
Peter Rappoport relative to Sumru Altuğ Türkiye Sumru Altuğ's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.7×
Sumru Altuğ · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Peter Rappoport

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Peter Rappoport's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Peter Rappoport with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Peter Rappoport more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Peter Rappoport

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Peter Rappoport. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Peter Rappoport. The network helps show where Peter Rappoport may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 7 scholars most cited alongside Peter Rappoport, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Peter Rappoport Line = papers co-authored together Peter Rappoport links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

13 of 13 papers shown
#Work
1 1989205
2
Were the Ordinalists Wrong About Welfare Economics
1983122
3
Was the crash of 1929 expected
199495
4 198831
5 199221
6
Is the Distinction between Anticipated and Unanticipated Money Growth Relevant in Explaining Aggregate Output
198719
7 19925
8
Reply to I. M. D. Little's Comment [Were the Ordinalists Wrong about Welfare Economics?]
19854
9
Reply to Professor Hennipman
19884
10
Reply to Professor Hennipman: Communications
19882
11 20092
12
Rational expectations and rationality
19821
13 20000

About Peter Rappoport

Peter Rappoport is a scholar working on Economics and Econometrics, General Economics, Econometrics and Finance, Finance, Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health and Infectious Diseases, having authored 13 papers that have together received 511 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Economic theories and models (3 papers), Monetary Policy and Economic Impact (3 papers), Game Theory and Voting Systems (2 papers), Economic Theory and Policy (2 papers), Market Dynamics and Volatility (2 papers), Economics of Agriculture and Food Markets (1 paper), Prenatal Screening and Diagnostics (1 paper) and Global Financial Crisis and Policies (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in General Economics, Econometrics and Finance (251 citations), Economics and Econometrics (374 citations), Finance (116 citations), General Decision Sciences (19 citations) and Accounting (40 citations). Peter Rappoport has collaborated with scholars based in United States and Italy. Frequent co-authors include Lucrezia Reichlin, Robert D. Cooter, Eugene N. White, Dermot Gately, Roman Frydman, Nachum Sicherman and Allan T. Bombard. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Economic Literature, American Economic Review, Financial Analysts Journal, Fetal Diagnosis and Therapy and The Energy Journal.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact