Peter Rappoport

883 citations
14 papers · 586 · h-index 8

Impact in

Papers in

Peter Rappoport

12 papers receiving 451 citations

Peers

Peter Rappoport
Comparison fields: 5 of 66
  • General Economics, Econometrics and Finance 283
  • Economics and Econometrics 424
  • General Decision Sciences 27
  • Finance 139
  • Accounting 41
Replace Marek Rusnák with:
Marek Rusnák Czechia
Sumru Altuğ Türkiye
Olav Bjerkholt Norway
G. V. L. Narasimham United States
Glenn A. Mills United Kingdom
Edward S. Knotek United States
Emiliano Santoro Denmark
Lorenzo Pozzi Belgium
Stephen K. Layson United States
Ulrich Fritsche Germany
Peter Rappoport relative to Marek Rusnák Czechia Marek Rusnák's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
Marek Rusnák · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Peter Rappoport

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Peter Rappoport's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Peter Rappoport with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Peter Rappoport more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Peter Rappoport

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Peter Rappoport. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Peter Rappoport. The network helps show where Peter Rappoport may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 7 scholars most cited alongside Peter Rappoport, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Peter Rappoport Line = papers co-authored together Peter Rappoport links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

14 of 14 papers shown
#Work
1 1989233
2
Were the Ordinalists Wrong About Welfare Economics
1983144
3
Was the crash of 1929 expected
1994104
4 198836
5 199221
6
Is the Distinction between Anticipated and Unanticipated Money Growth Relevant in Explaining Aggregate Output
198719
7
Reply to I. M. D. Little's Comment [Were the Ordinalists Wrong about Welfare Economics?]
19857
8
Reply to Professor Hennipman
19887
9 19927
10
Reply to Professor Hennipman: Communications
19883
11 20092
12 19892
13
Rational expectations and rationality
19821
14 20000

About Peter Rappoport

Peter Rappoport is a scholar working on Economics and Econometrics, General Economics, Econometrics and Finance, Finance, Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health and Infectious Diseases, having authored 14 papers that have together received 586 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Economic theories and models (4 papers), Monetary Policy and Economic Impact (4 papers), Economic Theory and Policy (3 papers), Game Theory and Voting Systems (2 papers), Market Dynamics and Volatility (2 papers), Economics of Agriculture and Food Markets (1 paper), Prenatal Screening and Diagnostics (1 paper) and Global Financial Crisis and Policies (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in General Economics, Econometrics and Finance (283 citations), Economics and Econometrics (424 citations), General Decision Sciences (27 citations), Finance (139 citations) and Accounting (41 citations). Peter Rappoport has collaborated with scholars based in United States and Italy. Frequent co-authors include Lucrezia Reichlin, Robert D. Cooter, Eugene N. White, Dermot Gately, Roman Frydman, Allan T. Bombard and Nachum Sicherman. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Economic Literature, American Economic Review, Journal of money credit and banking, The Economic Journal and The Energy Journal.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact