Peter Quax

86 papers receiving 945 citations

Peers

Peter Quax
Comparison fields: 5 of 73
  • Computer Networks and Communications 420
  • Human-Computer Interaction 85
  • Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition 297
  • Signal Processing 142
  • Transportation 63
Replace Wim Lamotte with:
Wim Lamotte Belgium
Oriana Riva United States
Felix Xiaozhu Lin United States
Kuan‐Ta Chen Taiwan
Justin Cappos United States
Volker Hilt Germany
Martı́n Varela Finland
Ian Fette United States
Harri Hakonen Finland
Reuben Edwards United Kingdom
Peter Quax relative to Wim Lamotte Belgium Wim Lamotte's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
Wim Lamotte · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Peter Quax

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Peter Quax's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Peter Quax with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Peter Quax more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Peter Quax

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Peter Quax. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Peter Quax. The network helps show where Peter Quax may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 24 scholars most cited alongside Peter Quax, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Peter Quax Line = papers co-authored together Peter Quax links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 89 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2004112
2 2017100
3 201380
4 201875
5 202048
6 201732
7 201831
8 201327
9 200325
10 201124
11
Personal Information Leakage by Abusing the {GDPR} 'Right of Access'
201921
12 201819
13 201216
14 201416
15 202214
16 201814
17 201813
18 200613
19 201212
20 201711

About Peter Quax

Peter Quax is a scholar working on Computer Networks and Communications, Sociology and Political Science, Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, Signal Processing and Artificial Intelligence, having authored 89 papers that have together received 988 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Multimedia Communication and Technology (28 papers), Image and Video Quality Assessment (22 papers), Peer-to-Peer Network Technologies (17 papers), Video Analysis and Summarization (15 papers), Video Coding and Compression Technologies (12 papers), Network Traffic and Congestion Control (10 papers), Internet Traffic Analysis and Secure E-voting (8 papers) and Opportunistic and Delay-Tolerant Networks (8 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Computer Networks and Communications (420 citations), Human-Computer Interaction (85 citations), Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (297 citations), Signal Processing (142 citations) and Transportation (63 citations). Peter Quax has collaborated with scholars based in Belgium, United States and Mexico. Frequent co-authors include Wim Lamotte, Pieter Robyns, Danny De Vleeschauwer, Dave Singelée, Bart Preneel, Eduard Marin, Karin Coninx, Jori Liesenborgs, Frank Van Reeth and Gustavo Rovelo Ruiz. Their work appears in journals such as Multimedia Tools and Applications, IACR Transactions on Cryptographic Hardware and Embedded Systems, Lecture notes in computer science, Lecture notes in business information processing and Security and Communication Networks.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact