Peter Proks

7.6k citations
96 papers · 5.0k · h-index 40

Impact in

Papers in

Peter Proks

95 papers receiving 4.9k citations

Peers

Peter Proks
Comparison fields: 5 of 110
  • Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism 1.3k
  • Pathology and Forensic Medicine 1.3k
  • Surgery 2.3k
  • Physiology 224
  • Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 653
Replace U. Panten with:
U. Panten Germany
Show‐Ling Shyng United States
Stephen J.H. Ashcroft United Kingdom
John P. Clement United States
Bernward A. Schölkens Germany
Krister Bokvist Sweden
Marek Treiman Denmark
André Herchuelz Belgium
Mark H. Perrone United States
Junhui Sun United States
Peter Proks relative to U. Panten Germany U. Panten's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×
U. Panten · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Peter Proks

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Peter Proks's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Peter Proks with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Peter Proks more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Peter Proks

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Peter Proks. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Peter Proks. The network helps show where Peter Proks may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Peter Proks, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Peter Proks Line = papers co-authored together Peter Proks links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 96 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2002385
2 2005339
3 1994210
4 2014199
5 2004187
6 1997183
7 2006165
8 2007160
9 2005152
10 1998150
11 1996138
12 2005133
13 1997130
14 2008116
15 1998112
16 1997110
17 200890
18 200586
19 199981
20 199980

About Peter Proks

Peter Proks is a scholar working on Molecular Biology, Surgery, Pathology and Forensic Medicine, Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism and Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience, having authored 96 papers that have together received 5.0k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Pancreatic function and diabetes (42 papers), Cardiac Ischemia and Reperfusion (41 papers), Ion channel regulation and function (37 papers), Hyperglycemia and glycemic control in critically ill and hospitalized patients (17 papers), Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research (13 papers), Cardiac electrophysiology and arrhythmias (12 papers), Fuel Cells and Related Materials (10 papers) and Cardiac Arrest and Resuscitation (9 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism (1.3k citations), Pathology and Forensic Medicine (1.3k citations), Surgery (2.3k citations), Physiology (224 citations) and Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (653 citations). Peter Proks has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Slovakia and Germany. Frequent co-authors include Frances M. Ashcroft, Fiona M. Gribble, Frank Reimann, Patrik Rorsman, Paul A. Smith, Christophe A. Girard, Andrew T. Hattersley, Jennifer F. Antcliff, Kenju Shimomura and Stephen J. Tucker. Their work appears in journals such as The Journal of Physiology, Diabetes, Diabetologia, The Journal of General Physiology and Human Molecular Genetics.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact