Peter Pecher
Impact in
-
- Angiogenesis and VEGF in Cancer
- Fibroblast Growth Factor Research
- Surgery top 10%
- Coronary Interventions and Diagnostics
- Tissue Engineering and Regenerative Medicine
Papers in
- Surgery 7
- Coronary Interventions and Diagnostics 6
- Cardiac and Coronary Surgery Techniques 5
-
- Fibroblast Growth Factor Research 5
- Heat shock proteins research 3
- Angiogenesis and VEGF in Cancer 2
- Co-authors
- Th. Stegmann (2 shared papers)B. U. Specht (1 shared paper)Bernd A Schumacher (9 shared papers)Andreas Hannekum (5 shared papers)Jörg Haberstroh (1 shared paper)Bernd-Ulrich v. Specht (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- The Annals of Thoracic Surgery (3 papers)Circulation (1 paper)Basic Research in Cardiology (1 paper)Zeitschrift für Kardiologie (1 paper)PubMed (4 papers)
- Partner nations
- Germany
In The Last Decade
Peter Pecher
10 papers receiving 592 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 48
- Molecular Biology 337
- Surgery 210
- Genetics 41
- Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine 105
- Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging 96
Countries citing papers authored by Peter Pecher
This map shows the geographic impact of Peter Pecher's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Peter Pecher with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Peter Pecher more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Peter Pecher
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Peter Pecher. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Peter Pecher. The network helps show where Peter Pecher may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 6 scholars most cited alongside Peter Pecher, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1998 | 439 | |
| 2 | 2000 | 56 | |
| 3 | 2002 | 45 | |
| 4 | The stimulation of neoangiogenesis in the ischemic human heart by the growth factor FGF: first clinical results. | 1998 | 29 |
| 5 | 2002 | 25 | |
| 6 | The stimulation of neo-angiogenesis in the ischemic heart by the human growth factor FGF. | 1998 | 12 |
| 7 | 2000 | 7 | |
| 8 | [Neoangiogenesis by local gene therapy: a new therapeutic concept in the treatment of coronary disease]. | 2000 | 4 |
| 9 | Heat shock protein 60 expression in patients undergoing cardiac operations. | 2003 | 4 |
| 10 | 2001 | 2 |
About Peter Pecher
Peter Pecher is a scholar working on Surgery, Molecular Biology, Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging, Pathology and Forensic Medicine and Nuclear Energy and Engineering, having authored 10 papers that have together received 623 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Coronary Interventions and Diagnostics (6 papers), Cardiac and Coronary Surgery Techniques (5 papers), Fibroblast Growth Factor Research (5 papers), Heat shock proteins research (3 papers), Cardiac Imaging and Diagnostics (2 papers), Angiogenesis and VEGF in Cancer (2 papers) and Cardiac Ischemia and Reperfusion (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Molecular Biology (337 citations), Surgery (210 citations), Genetics (41 citations), Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine (105 citations) and Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging (96 citations). Peter Pecher has collaborated with scholars based in Germany. Frequent co-authors include Th. Stegmann, B. U. Specht, Bernd A Schumacher, Andreas Hannekum, Jörg Haberstroh and Bernd-Ulrich v. Specht. Their work appears in journals such as The Annals of Thoracic Surgery, Circulation, Basic Research in Cardiology, Zeitschrift für Kardiologie and PubMed.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.