Peter P. Stanich

68 papers receiving 928 citations

Peers

Peter P. Stanich
Comparison fields: 5 of 71
  • Gastroenterology 118
  • Hepatology 125
  • Pathology and Forensic Medicine 214
  • Oncology 221
  • Surgery 295
Replace Jean Marc Gornet with:
Jean Marc Gornet France
Emad Mansoor United States
K. P. Batts United States
Isao Kurosaki Japan
Mauro Manno Italy
James M. O’Riordan Ireland
Akin Inderson Netherlands
Mark C. Winslet United Kingdom
David L. Roseman United States
Frans‐Thomas Fork Sweden
Peter P. Stanich relative to Jean Marc Gornet France Jean Marc Gornet's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×4×6×8.7×
Jean Marc Gornet · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Peter P. Stanich

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Peter P. Stanich's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Peter P. Stanich with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Peter P. Stanich more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Peter P. Stanich

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Peter P. Stanich. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Peter P. Stanich. The network helps show where Peter P. Stanich may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Peter P. Stanich, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Peter P. Stanich Line = papers co-authored together Peter P. Stanich links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 77 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2011125
2 201582
3 201163
4 201554
5 201851
6 201443
7 201343
8 202032
9 202029
10 202229
11 201726
12 202226
13 202126
14 201425
15 201820
16 202218
17 201417
18 201714
19 201613
20 201313

About Peter P. Stanich

Peter P. Stanich is a scholar working on Gastroenterology, Pathology and Forensic Medicine, Oncology, Surgery and Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine, having authored 77 papers that have together received 953 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Genetic factors in colorectal cancer (21 papers), Colorectal Cancer Screening and Detection (12 papers), Gastrointestinal disorders and treatments (6 papers), Gastrointestinal Tumor Research and Treatment (6 papers), Gastric Cancer Management and Outcomes (6 papers), Gastrointestinal Bleeding Diagnosis and Treatment (5 papers), Cancer Genomics and Diagnostics (5 papers) and Pancreatitis Pathology and Treatment (5 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Gastroenterology (118 citations), Hepatology (125 citations), Pathology and Forensic Medicine (214 citations), Oncology (221 citations) and Surgery (295 citations). Peter P. Stanich has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Belgium and Iceland. Frequent co-authors include Alice M. Hinton, Somashekar G. Krishna, Rachel Pearlman, Darwin L. Conwell, H. Hampel, Hisham Hussan, Keith D. Lindor, Felicity Enders, Einar Björnsson and Roberta A. Jorgensen. Their work appears in journals such as The American Journal of Gastroenterology, Clinical Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Journal of Clinical Gastroenterology, Gastroenterology and Clinical and Translational Gastroenterology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact