Péter Osváth

2.0k citations
131 papers · 1.4k · h-index 21

Impact in

Papers in

Péter Osváth

121 papers receiving 1.3k citations

Peers

Péter Osváth
Comparison fields: 5 of 144
  • Clinical Psychology 319
  • Inorganic Chemistry 206
  • Oncology 238
  • Biological Psychiatry 22
  • Psychiatry and Mental health 125
Replace Maria Engström with:
Maria Engström Sweden
Subhash C. Bhatia United States
Xiangli Chen China
Maiko Fujimori Japan
Ming-sheng Huang China
Neeraj Gill Australia
Christopher M. Thompson United States
Sanjib K. Patra India
Bengt Harald Jonsson Sweden
Stephen M. Moerlein United States
Péter Osváth relative to Maria Engström Sweden Maria Engström's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×3×3.7×
Maria Engström · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Péter Osváth

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Péter Osváth's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Péter Osváth with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Péter Osváth more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Péter Osváth

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Péter Osváth. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Péter Osváth. The network helps show where Péter Osváth may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Péter Osváth, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Péter Osváth Line = papers co-authored together Péter Osváth links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 131 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 198865
2 200460
3 202357
4 200151
5 201851
6 199737
7 202337
8 200336
9
Gender differences in suicide attempters in Hungary: retrospective epidemiological study.
200533
10 202033
11 200333
12 198732
13 201530
14 199327
15 198926
16 201925
17 200224
18 200323
19 199923
20 199222

About Péter Osváth

Péter Osváth is a scholar working on Clinical Psychology, Inorganic Chemistry, Oncology, Psychiatry and Mental health and Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials, having authored 131 papers that have together received 1.4k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Suicide and Self-Harm Studies (28 papers), Metal complexes synthesis and properties (20 papers), Metal-Catalyzed Oxygenation Mechanisms (13 papers), Magnetism in coordination complexes (12 papers), Porphyrin and Phthalocyanine Chemistry (9 papers), Psychosomatic Disorders and Their Treatments (6 papers), Metal-Organic Frameworks: Synthesis and Applications (4 papers) and Mental Health Treatment and Access (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Clinical Psychology (319 citations), Inorganic Chemistry (206 citations), Oncology (238 citations), Biological Psychiatry (22 citations) and Psychiatry and Mental health (125 citations). Péter Osváth has collaborated with scholars based in Hungary, United States and Australia. Frequent co-authors include Viktor Vörös, Sándor Fekete, A. Graham Lappin, Tamás Tényi, Alan M. Sargeson, David C. Weatherburn, Szabolcs Fekete, Zoltán Rihmer, Rosemary A. Marusak and Attila Kovács. Their work appears in journals such as Inorganic Chemistry, Australian Journal of Chemistry, European Neuropsychopharmacology, Journal of Affective Disorders and BMC Psychiatry.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact