Peter Nick
Impact in
- Plant Science top 0.2%
- Plant Molecular Biology Research
- Plant Stress Responses and Tolerance
- Plant-Microbe Interactions and Immunity
- Plant Parasitism and Resistance
- Polysaccharides and Plant Cell Walls
- Cell Biology top 1%
- Microtubule and mitosis dynamics
Papers in
- Plant Science 172
- Plant Molecular Biology Research 78
- Polysaccharides and Plant Cell Walls 20
- Plant Stress Responses and Tolerance 20
- Plant-Microbe Interactions and Immunity 19
- Light effects on plants 19
-
- Plant Reproductive Biology 60
- Photosynthetic Processes and Mechanisms 47
- Co-authors
- Michael Riemann (50 shared papers)Ahmed Ismail (8 shared papers)Masaki Furuya (10 shared papers)Jan Maisch (16 shared papers)Prisca Campanoni (2 shared papers)Shin Takeda (1 shared paper)Frank Waller (7 shared papers)Mohamed Hazman (6 shared papers)
In The Last Decade
Peter Nick
237 papers receiving 7.2k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 127
- Plant Science 5.5k
- Cell Biology 1.2k
- Molecular Biology 3.8k
- Insect Science 552
- Physiology 192
Countries citing papers authored by Peter Nick
This map shows the geographic impact of Peter Nick's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Peter Nick with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Peter Nick more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Peter Nick
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Peter Nick. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Peter Nick. The network helps show where Peter Nick may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Peter Nick, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
Showing the 20 most-cited of 253 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2014 | 265 | |
| 2 | 2015 | 244 | |
| 3 | 2013 | 218 | |
| 4 | 2015 | 165 | |
| 5 | 2005 | 153 | |
| 6 | 2003 | 143 | |
| 7 | 2012 | 134 | |
| 8 | 2011 | 126 | |
| 9 | 1990 | 123 | |
| 10 | 2003 | 121 | |
| 11 | 2013 | 118 | |
| 12 | 2002 | 108 | |
| 13 | 2002 | 106 | |
| 14 | 2009 | 105 | |
| 15 | 2011 | 97 | |
| 16 | 1999 | 87 | |
| 17 | 2007 | 83 | |
| 18 | 2002 | 78 | |
| 19 | 2015 | 74 | |
| 20 | 1999 | 72 |
About Peter Nick
Peter Nick is a scholar working on Plant Science, Molecular Biology, Cell Biology, Insect Science and Biotechnology, having authored 253 papers that have together received 7.5k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Plant Molecular Biology Research (78 papers), Plant Reproductive Biology (60 papers), Photosynthetic Processes and Mechanisms (47 papers), Microtubule and mitosis dynamics (29 papers), Polysaccharides and Plant Cell Walls (20 papers), Plant Stress Responses and Tolerance (20 papers), Plant-Microbe Interactions and Immunity (19 papers) and Light effects on plants (19 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Plant Science (5.5k citations), Cell Biology (1.2k citations), Molecular Biology (3.8k citations), Insect Science (552 citations) and Physiology (192 citations). Peter Nick has collaborated with scholars based in Germany, China and Japan. Frequent co-authors include Michael Riemann, Ahmed Ismail, Masaki Furuya, Jan Maisch, Prisca Campanoni, Shin Takeda, Frank Waller, Mohamed Hazman, Fei Qiao and Eberhard Schäfer. Their work appears in journals such as PROTOPLASMA, Planta, Journal of Experimental Botany, Journal of Plant Physiology and The Plant Journal.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.