Peter Neyroud

1.5k citations
61 papers · 790 · h-index 14

Impact in

Papers in

Peter Neyroud

55 papers receiving 701 citations

Peers

Peter Neyroud
Comparison fields: 5 of 68
  • Political Science and International Relations 444
  • Health 119
  • Sociology and Political Science 652
  • Public Administration 20
  • Gender Studies 42
Replace Ling Ren with:
Ling Ren United States
Karen Bullock United Kingdom
Willard M. Oliver United States
Kim Michelle Lersch United States
William V. Pelfrey United States
Kathleen J. Frydl United States
Tammy Rinehart Kochel United States
Andrew L. Giacomazzi United States
P. A. J. Waddington United Kingdom
Ben Bowling United Kingdom
Peter Neyroud relative to Ling Ren United States Ling Ren's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.7×
Ling Ren · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Peter Neyroud

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Peter Neyroud's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Peter Neyroud with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Peter Neyroud more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Peter Neyroud

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Peter Neyroud. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Peter Neyroud. The network helps show where Peter Neyroud may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Peter Neyroud, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Peter Neyroud Line = papers co-authored together Peter Neyroud links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 61 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2016170
2 200194
3 202166
4
Police Science: Toward a New Paradigm
201248
5 201730
6 200826
7 200826
8 201824
9 201422
10 202120
11 202020
12 202115
13 202114
14 201514
15 201313
16 200912
17
Public Participation in Policing
200111
18
Police Ethics and Values
201211
19 201111
20 199510

About Peter Neyroud

Peter Neyroud is a scholar working on Political Science and International Relations, Sociology and Political Science, Clinical Psychology, Strategy and Management and General Health Professions, having authored 61 papers that have together received 790 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Policing Practices and Perceptions (33 papers), Crime Patterns and Interventions (28 papers), Criminal Justice and Corrections Analysis (16 papers), Crime, Illicit Activities, and Governance (7 papers), Criminal Law and Evidence (3 papers), Regulation and Compliance Studies (3 papers), Crime, Deviance, and Social Control (3 papers) and European Criminal Justice and Data Protection (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Political Science and International Relations (444 citations), Health (119 citations), Sociology and Political Science (652 citations), Public Administration (20 citations) and Gender Studies (42 citations). Peter Neyroud has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Slovenia. Frequent co-authors include Lawrence W. Sherman, Alan Beckley, Sanja Kutnjak Ivković, Jon Maskály, David Weisburd, Emma Disley, Tim Newburn, Molly Slothower, Jacqueline Hodgson and Yuning Wu. Their work appears in journals such as Policing A Journal of Policy and Practice, International Criminal Justice Review, Criminology & Public Policy, Police Practice and Research and Policing & Society.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact