Peter Muth
Impact in
- Pharmacology top 5%
- Antibiotics Pharmacokinetics and Efficacy
- Pharmacogenetics and Drug Metabolism
- Molecular Medicine top 10%
- Antibiotic Resistance in Bacteria
Papers in
-
- Antibiotics Pharmacokinetics and Efficacy 7
- Oncology 6
- Cancer Treatment and Pharmacology 2
- Drug Transport and Resistance Mechanisms 2
- Co-authors
- F. Sörgel (8 shared papers)Gerhard Mahr (4 shared papers)H Vergin (4 shared papers)Roland Nau (1 shared paper)Hilmar Walter Prange (1 shared paper)Herbert Kolenda (1 shared paper)Wolfgang W. Bolten (3 shared papers)Martina Kinzig (2 shared papers)
- Journals
- Journal of Chromatography A (4 papers)Clinical Pharmacokinetics (2 papers)Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy (2 papers)Drugs (1 paper)Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- GermanySwitzerlandUnited Kingdom
In The Last Decade
Peter Muth
12 papers receiving 329 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 73
- Pharmacology 198
- Molecular Medicine 43
- Microbiology 41
- Analytical Chemistry 55
- Pharmacology 33
Countries citing papers authored by Peter Muth
This map shows the geographic impact of Peter Muth's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Peter Muth with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Peter Muth more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Peter Muth
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Peter Muth. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Peter Muth. The network helps show where Peter Muth may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 19 scholars most cited alongside Peter Muth, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1993 | 119 | |
| 2 | 1991 | 41 | |
| 3 | 1996 | 37 | |
| 4 | 1988 | 34 | |
| 5 | 1996 | 33 | |
| 6 | 1992 | 30 | |
| 7 | 1988 | 21 | |
| 8 | 1992 | 20 | |
| 9 | 1998 | 15 | |
| 10 | 1990 | 11 | |
| 11 | 1996 | 10 | |
| 12 | [6-methoxy-2-naphthylacetic acid level in plasma, synovial fluid and adjacent tissue in patients with rheumatoid arthritis or gonarthroses after a 4-day therapy with nabumetone (Arthaxan)]. | 1991 | 2 |
| 13 | 1988 | 1 |
About Peter Muth
Peter Muth is a scholar working on Pharmacology, Oncology, Analytical Chemistry, Epidemiology and Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health, having authored 13 papers that have together received 374 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Antibiotics Pharmacokinetics and Efficacy (7 papers), Analytical Methods in Pharmaceuticals (3 papers), Pneumonia and Respiratory Infections (3 papers), Cancer Treatment and Pharmacology (2 papers), Drug Transport and Resistance Mechanisms (2 papers), Cancer therapeutics and mechanisms (2 papers), Pharmaceutical studies and practices (2 papers) and Cerebrospinal fluid and hydrocephalus (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Pharmacology (198 citations), Molecular Medicine (43 citations), Microbiology (41 citations), Analytical Chemistry (55 citations) and Pharmacology (33 citations). Peter Muth has collaborated with scholars based in Germany, Switzerland and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include F. Sörgel, Gerhard Mahr, H Vergin, Roland Nau, Hilmar Walter Prange, Herbert Kolenda, Wolfgang W. Bolten, Martina Kinzig, Kurt G. Naber and Richard A. Metz. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Chromatography A, Clinical Pharmacokinetics, Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy, Drugs and Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.