Peter Meyer

82 papers receiving 1.5k citations

Peers

Peter Meyer
Comparison fields: 5 of 102
  • Insect Science 823
  • Nature and Landscape Conservation 543
  • Global and Planetary Change 580
  • Space and Planetary Science 30
  • Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics 349
Replace Péter Ódor with:
Péter Ódor Hungary
Juyu Lian China
Adam S. Hadley United States
Anders Mårell France
Andrew R. Moldenke United States
Niels Brouwers Australia
Jacob Heilmann‐Clausen Denmark
Masahiro Nakamura Japan
Cédric Gaucherel France
Dominique Boucher Canada
Peter Meyer relative to Péter Ódor Hungary Péter Ódor's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×1.8×
Péter Ódor · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Peter Meyer

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Peter Meyer's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Peter Meyer with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Peter Meyer more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Peter Meyer

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Peter Meyer. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Peter Meyer. The network helps show where Peter Meyer may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Peter Meyer, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Peter Meyer Line = papers co-authored together Peter Meyer links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 97 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2005316
2 2019129
3 2009119
4 200377
5 201063
6 199158
7 201750
8 196850
9 201842
10 202039
11 199934
12 202232
13 202332
14 198930
15 202128
16 201628
17
Zur Zukunft der Buche (Fagus sylvatica L.) in Mitteleuropa. Kritische Anmerkungen zu einem Beitrag von RENNENBERG et al
200526
18 201825
19 201423
20 201422

About Peter Meyer

Peter Meyer is a scholar working on Insect Science, Global and Planetary Change, Nature and Landscape Conservation, Artificial Intelligence and Language and Linguistics, having authored 97 papers that have together received 1.6k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Forest Ecology and Biodiversity Studies (35 papers), Forest Management and Policy (24 papers), Botany and Plant Ecology Studies (12 papers), Forest ecology and management (11 papers), Lexicography and Language Studies (10 papers), Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies (9 papers), Natural Language Processing Techniques (8 papers) and Ecology, Conservation, and Geographical Studies (8 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Insect Science (823 citations), Nature and Landscape Conservation (543 citations), Global and Planetary Change (580 citations), Space and Planetary Science (30 citations) and Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics (349 citations). Peter Meyer has collaborated with scholars based in Germany, Switzerland and Belgium. Frequent co-authors include Andreas Mölder, M.U. Schmidt, Tomáš Vrška, S.M.J. Wijdeven, Jurij Diaci, Susanne Winter, Tibor Standovár, E. P. Mountford, Péter Ódor and Katrine Hahn. Their work appears in journals such as Forest Ecology and Management, Ecological Indicators, Journal of Quantitative Linguistics, Speech Communication and European Journal of Forest Research.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact