Peter Meindl

24 papers receiving 790 citations

Peers

Peter Meindl
Comparison fields: 5 of 109
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 226
  • Information Systems and Management 74
  • Social Psychology 178
  • Epidemiology 252
  • Applied Psychology 24
Replace David J. Johnson with:
David J. Johnson United States
Agneta Johansson Sweden
I‐Hua Chen Taiwan
Yuta Kawamura Japan
Jun Gu Australia
Eric Seemann Germany
Kathleen M. Clark United States
John Bradshaw United Kingdom
Tine Nielsen Denmark
Robert M. Rosenbaum United States
Peter Meindl relative to David J. Johnson United States David J. Johnson's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×4.1×
David J. Johnson · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Peter Meindl

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Peter Meindl's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Peter Meindl with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Peter Meindl more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Peter Meindl

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Peter Meindl. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Peter Meindl. The network helps show where Peter Meindl may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Peter Meindl, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Peter Meindl Line = papers co-authored together Peter Meindl links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 25 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1974252
2 2015145
3 1974103
4 201556
5 201652
6 202036
7 202135
8 197127
9 202225
10 201622
11 196717
12 197315
13 201914
14 201213
15 201610
16 20219
17 20237
18 20203
19 20193
20 20142

About Peter Meindl

Peter Meindl is a scholar working on Social Psychology, Sociology and Political Science, Cognitive Neuroscience, Education and Organic Chemistry, having authored 25 papers that have together received 850 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment (10 papers), Social and Intergroup Psychology (8 papers), Cultural Differences and Values (7 papers), Values and Moral Education (5 papers), Influenza Virus Research Studies (3 papers), Carbohydrate Chemistry and Synthesis (3 papers), Psychological Treatments and Assessments (2 papers) and Free Will and Agency (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Cognitive Neuroscience (226 citations), Information Systems and Management (74 citations), Social Psychology (178 citations), Epidemiology (252 citations) and Applied Psychology (24 citations). Peter Meindl has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Austria and Puerto Rico. Frequent co-authors include G. Bodo, Peter Palese, Jerome L. Schulman, Jesse Graham, H. Tuppy, KATE JOHNSON, Li Zhang, Ravi Iyer, Hyemin Han and Spassena Koleva. Their work appears in journals such as Virology, Journal of Personality, Journal of Moral Education, Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews Cognitive Science and Current Directions in Psychological Science.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact