Peter McQuade

495 citations
7 papers · 211 · h-index 4

Impact in

Papers in

Peter McQuade

6 papers receiving 194 citations

Peers

Peter McQuade
Comparison fields: 5 of 14
  • Finance 174
  • General Economics, Econometrics and Finance 93
  • Accounting 45
  • Economics and Econometrics 73
  • Strategy and Management 27
Replace Salih Fendoğlu with:
Salih Fendoğlu Türkiye
Lorenza Martı́nez Mexico
Laurie Pounder DeMarco United States
Esteban Rodrigo Vesperoni United States
Nathan Converse United States
Martin Bijsterbosch Germany
Alessio Ciarlone Italy
Adam Honig United States
Jay Surti United States
Wensheng Peng United Kingdom
Peter McQuade relative to Salih Fendoğlu Türkiye Salih Fendoğlu's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×1.9×
Salih Fendoğlu · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Peter McQuade

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Peter McQuade's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Peter McQuade with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Peter McQuade more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Peter McQuade

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Peter McQuade. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Peter McQuade. The network helps show where Peter McQuade may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 8 scholars most cited alongside Peter McQuade, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Peter McQuade Line = papers co-authored together Peter McQuade links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

7 of 7 papers shown
#Work
1 2013178
2 201717
3 202010
4 20204
5
Foreign Exchange and External Sector Developments in China
20191
6 20171
7 20250

About Peter McQuade

Peter McQuade is a scholar working on Finance, General Economics, Econometrics and Finance, Economics and Econometrics, Strategy and Management and Development, having authored 7 papers that have together received 211 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Global Financial Crisis and Policies (7 papers), Banking stability, regulation, efficiency (3 papers), Monetary Policy and Economic Impact (2 papers), State Capitalism and Financial Governance (2 papers), Housing Market and Economics (1 paper), International Development and Aid (1 paper), Market Dynamics and Volatility (1 paper) and Credit Risk and Financial Regulations (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Finance (174 citations), General Economics, Econometrics and Finance (93 citations), Accounting (45 citations), Economics and Econometrics (73 citations) and Strategy and Management (27 citations). Peter McQuade has collaborated with scholars based in Germany, Ireland and Netherlands. Frequent co-authors include Philip R. Lane, Martin Schmitz, David‐Jan Jansen, Anna Samarina, Jakob de Haan, Michael J. O’Grady, Cosimo Pancaro and Martin Larch. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of International Money and Finance, Review of International Economics, Economics Letters, Scandinavian Journal of Economics and RePEc: Research Papers in Economics.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact