Peter Mak

768 citations
13 papers · 546 · h-index 7

Impact in

Papers in

Peter Mak

12 papers receiving 528 citations

Peers

Peter Mak
Comparison fields: 5 of 69
  • Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine 113
  • Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine 198
  • Surgery 355
  • Geriatrics and Gerontology 24
  • Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine 19
Replace Nicholas Hackett with:
Nicholas Hackett United States
Andrea Saporito Switzerland
R Pringle United Kingdom
Melville Q. Wyche United States
Poupak Rahimzadeh Iran
Michelle A. O. Kinney United States
Matthias Müller Germany
David Baines Australia
Denise Joffe United States
Federico Piccioni Italy
Peter Mak relative to Nicholas Hackett United States Nicholas Hackett's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.4×
Nicholas Hackett · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Peter Mak

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Peter Mak's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Peter Mak with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Peter Mak more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Peter Mak

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Peter Mak. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Peter Mak. The network helps show where Peter Mak may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 15 scholars most cited alongside Peter Mak, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Peter Mak Line = papers co-authored together Peter Mak links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

13 of 13 papers shown
#Work
1 2002336
2 200178
3 200546
4 200233
5 201319
6 20049
7 20006
8 20036
9 20025
10 20143
11 20023
12 20142
13
VALUE AT RISK AND EXPECTED SHORTFALL: A COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF PERFORMANCE IN NORMAL AND CRISIS MARKETS
20140

About Peter Mak

Peter Mak is a scholar working on Surgery, Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine, Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Pathology and Forensic Medicine and Pharmacology, having authored 13 papers that have together received 546 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Hemodynamic Monitoring and Therapy (3 papers), Anesthesia and Pain Management (3 papers), Spine and Intervertebral Disc Pathology (2 papers), Epilepsy research and treatment (2 papers), Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation (2 papers), Heart Rate Variability and Autonomic Control (2 papers), Cardiac, Anesthesia and Surgical Outcomes (2 papers) and Pharmacological Effects and Toxicity Studies (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine (113 citations), Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine (198 citations), Surgery (355 citations), Geriatrics and Gerontology (24 citations) and Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine (19 citations). Peter Mak has collaborated with scholars based in China, Hong Kong and Canada. Frequent co-authors include Michael G. Irwin, Clara Ooi, Hossam El Beheiry, Pirjo Manninen, Andrés M. Lozano, Mojgan Hodaie, Paul S. Tumber, Siu Lun Tsui, WY Ip and S. L. Tsui. Their work appears in journals such as Canadian Journal of Anesthesia/Journal canadien d anesthésie, Journal of Clinical Anesthesia, Acta Anaesthesiologica Scandinavica, British Journal of Anaesthesia and Journal of Neurosurgical Anesthesiology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact