Peter Mach

34 papers receiving 1.8k citations

Peers

Peter Mach
Comparison fields: 5 of 76
  • Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials 912
  • Spectroscopy 299
  • Surfaces, Coatings and Films 111
  • Electrical and Electronic Engineering 893
  • Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics 374
Replace Mohammed Ibn‐Elhaj with:
Mohammed Ibn‐Elhaj France
Robert E. Geer United States
Dean R. Evans United States
Alasdair W. Clark United Kingdom
Graciela B. Blanchet United States
Zvi Kotler Israel
Qi Lin China
James L. Speidell United States
Vittorianna Tasco Italy
Ursula J. Gibson United States
Peter Mach relative to Mohammed Ibn‐Elhaj France Mohammed Ibn‐Elhaj's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×3×3.8×
Mohammed Ibn‐Elhaj · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Peter Mach

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Peter Mach's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Peter Mach with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Peter Mach more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Peter Mach

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Peter Mach. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Peter Mach. The network helps show where Peter Mach may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Peter Mach, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Peter Mach Line = papers co-authored together Peter Mach links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 36 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1998294
2 2003282
3 2001255
4 1999146
5 1994138
6 200299
7 200382
8 198870
9 200268
10 199954
11 199847
12 200247
13 200245
14 199739
15 200338
16 200035
17 200234
18 199629
19 199828
20 199423

About Peter Mach

Peter Mach is a scholar working on Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials, Surfaces, Coatings and Films, Electrical and Electronic Engineering, Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics and Mechanics of Materials, having authored 36 papers that have together received 1.9k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Liquid Crystal Research Advancements (20 papers), Photonic and Optical Devices (7 papers), Advanced Fiber Optic Sensors (6 papers), Adhesion, Friction, and Surface Interactions (4 papers), Electrowetting and Microfluidic Technologies (4 papers), Photonic Crystals and Applications (4 papers), Molecular spectroscopy and chirality (3 papers) and Surface Modification and Superhydrophobicity (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials (912 citations), Spectroscopy (299 citations), Surfaces, Coatings and Films (111 citations), Electrical and Electronic Engineering (893 citations) and Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics (374 citations). Peter Mach has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Germany and France. Frequent co-authors include Shu Min Yang, Tom N. Krupenkin, C. C. Huang, T. Stoebe, Pierre Wiltzius, Ron Pindak, A. M. Levelut, Lars R. Furenlid, Ph. Barois and John A. Rogers. Their work appears in journals such as Applied Physics Letters, Physical Review Letters, Europhysics Letters (EPL), Langmuir and The Journal of Urology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact