Peter M. Scarbrough
Impact in
- Cancer Research top 10%
- Cancer, Hypoxia, and Metabolism
- Rehabilitation top 10%
- Exercise and Physiological Responses
Papers in
-
- Redox biology and oxidative stress 3
- Glutathione Transferases and Polymorphisms 1
-
- Sulfur Compounds in Biology 2
- Antioxidant Activity and Oxidative Stress 2
- Eicosanoids and Hypertension Pharmacology 1
- Co-authors
- Dora Il’yasova (4 shared papers)Ivan Spasojević (2 shared papers)Mark W. Dewhirst (4 shared papers)Chelsea D. Landon (2 shared papers)Douglas R. Spitz (3 shared papers)Walter H. Watson (2 shared papers)Gregory M. Palmer (2 shared papers)Christopher D. Lascola (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- Annals of Epidemiology (3 papers)Free Radical Biology and Medicine (1 paper)PLoS ONE (1 paper)Biodemography and Social Biology (1 paper)Redox Biology (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United StatesBelgium
In The Last Decade
Peter M. Scarbrough
12 papers receiving 850 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 100
- Cancer Research 225
- Rehabilitation 56
- Biochemistry 43
- Oncology 169
- Molecular Biology 357
Countries citing papers authored by Peter M. Scarbrough
This map shows the geographic impact of Peter M. Scarbrough's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Peter M. Scarbrough with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Peter M. Scarbrough more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Peter M. Scarbrough
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Peter M. Scarbrough. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Peter M. Scarbrough. The network helps show where Peter M. Scarbrough may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Peter M. Scarbrough, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2015 | 206 | |
| 2 | 2012 | 204 | |
| 3 | 2013 | 151 | |
| 4 | 2011 | 76 | |
| 5 | 2014 | 74 | |
| 6 | 2011 | 70 | |
| 7 | 2014 | 20 | |
| 8 | 2016 | 18 | |
| 9 | 2012 | 15 | |
| 10 | 2015 | 13 | |
| 11 | 2013 | 9 | |
| 12 | 2012 | 6 |
About Peter M. Scarbrough
Peter M. Scarbrough is a scholar working on Molecular Biology, Biochemistry, Cancer Research, Biochemistry and Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health, having authored 12 papers that have together received 862 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Redox biology and oxidative stress (3 papers), Cancer, Hypoxia, and Metabolism (3 papers), Sulfur Compounds in Biology (2 papers), Antioxidant Activity and Oxidative Stress (2 papers), Glutathione Transferases and Polymorphisms (1 paper), Nitric Oxide and Endothelin Effects (1 paper), Advanced Radiotherapy Techniques (1 paper) and Eicosanoids and Hypertension Pharmacology (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Cancer Research (225 citations), Rehabilitation (56 citations), Biochemistry (43 citations), Oncology (169 citations) and Molecular Biology (357 citations). Peter M. Scarbrough has collaborated with scholars based in United States and Belgium. Frequent co-authors include Dora Il’yasova, Ivan Spasojević, Mark W. Dewhirst, Chelsea D. Landon, Douglas R. Spitz, Walter H. Watson, Gregory M. Palmer, Christopher D. Lascola, Lee W. Jones and Gayathri R. Devi. Their work appears in journals such as Annals of Epidemiology, Free Radical Biology and Medicine, PLoS ONE, Biodemography and Social Biology and Redox Biology.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.