Peter Lyle
Impact in
- Human-Computer Interaction top 2%
- Innovative Human-Technology Interaction
-
- Innovative Approaches in Technology and Social Development
Papers in
-
- Innovative Human-Technology Interaction 16
-
- Innovative Approaches in Technology and Social Development 10
- Co-authors
- Maurizio Teli (9 shared papers)Marcus Foth (12 shared papers)Jaz Hee-jeong Choi (12 shared papers)Susanne Bødker (6 shared papers)Joanna Saad-Sulonen (3 shared papers)Henrik Korsgaard (4 shared papers)Stefano De Paoli (2 shared papers)Marisa Leavitt Cohn (1 shared paper)
In The Last Decade
Peter Lyle
30 papers receiving 483 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 68
- Human-Computer Interaction 262
- Management of Technology and Innovation 165
- Computer Science Applications 46
- Marketing 71
- Business and International Management 13
Countries citing papers authored by Peter Lyle
This map shows the geographic impact of Peter Lyle's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Peter Lyle with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Peter Lyle more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Peter Lyle
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Peter Lyle. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Peter Lyle. The network helps show where Peter Lyle may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 23 scholars most cited alongside Peter Lyle, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
Showing the 20 most-cited of 30 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2020 | 69 | |
| 2 | 2014 | 37 | |
| 3 | 2015 | 32 | |
| 4 | 2019 | 32 | |
| 5 | 2018 | 29 | |
| 6 | 2018 | 29 | |
| 7 | 2016 | 29 | |
| 8 | 2017 | 28 | |
| 9 | 2021 | 27 | |
| 10 | 2014 | 26 | |
| 11 | 2018 | 25 | |
| 12 | 2020 | 25 | |
| 13 | 2017 | 22 | |
| 14 | 2013 | 15 | |
| 15 | 2022 | 13 | |
| 16 | 2019 | 9 | |
| 17 | 2016 | 7 | |
| 18 | 2017 | 6 | |
| 19 | Start playing with your food: Fun food experiences with mobile social media | 2011 | 6 |
| 20 | 2015 | 5 |
About Peter Lyle
Peter Lyle is a scholar working on Human-Computer Interaction, Management of Technology and Innovation, Sociology and Political Science, Computer Science Applications and Plant Science, having authored 30 papers that have together received 493 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Innovative Human-Technology Interaction (16 papers), Innovative Approaches in Technology and Social Development (10 papers), Information Systems Theories and Implementation (8 papers), Urban Agriculture and Sustainability (6 papers), Organic Food and Agriculture (4 papers), Urban Green Space and Health (3 papers), Open Source Software Innovations (3 papers) and Green IT and Sustainability (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Human-Computer Interaction (262 citations), Management of Technology and Innovation (165 citations), Computer Science Applications (46 citations), Marketing (71 citations) and Business and International Management (13 citations). Peter Lyle has collaborated with scholars based in Australia, Denmark and Italy. Frequent co-authors include Maurizio Teli, Marcus Foth, Jaz Hee-jeong Choi, Susanne Bødker, Joanna Saad-Sulonen, Henrik Korsgaard, Stefano De Paoli, Marisa Leavitt Cohn, Greg Hearn and Antonella De Angeli. Their work appears in journals such as Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction, CoDesign, Futures, Multimodal Technologies and Interaction and Lecture notes in computer science.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.