Peter Ludé

1.3k citations
22 papers · 899 · h-index 11

Impact in

Papers in

Peter Ludé

20 papers receiving 879 citations

Peers

Peter Ludé
Comparison fields: 5 of 76
  • Pathology and Forensic Medicine 538
  • Clinical Psychology 174
  • Rehabilitation 48
  • Applied Psychology 28
  • Psychiatry and Mental health 78
Replace Christel M. C. van Leeuwen with:
Christel M. C. van Leeuwen Netherlands
Kathryn Boschen Canada
Jennifer Coker United States
Rebecca R. Clearman United States
Judith Gargaro Canada
Feng‐Hang Chang Taiwan
Myron G. Eisenberg United States
Jasmine Heath Hearn United Kingdom
Michael Stambrook Canada
Hugh Anton Canada
Peter Ludé relative to Christel M. C. van Leeuwen Netherlands Christel M. C. van Leeuwen's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.2×
Christel M. C. van Leeuwen · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Peter Ludé

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Peter Ludé's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Peter Ludé with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Peter Ludé more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Peter Ludé

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Peter Ludé. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Peter Ludé. The network helps show where Peter Ludé may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 23 scholars most cited alongside Peter Ludé, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Peter Ludé Line = papers co-authored together Peter Ludé links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 22 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2012293
2 2005206
3 201259
4 201048
5 201148
6 201448
7 200944
8 201142
9 201328
10 200627
11 200426
12 20029
13 20217
14 20215
15 20213
16 20162
17 20101
18 20161
19 20021
20 20141

About Peter Ludé

Peter Ludé is a scholar working on Pathology and Forensic Medicine, Clinical Psychology, Sociology and Political Science, Epidemiology and Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation, having authored 22 papers that have together received 899 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Spinal Cord Injury Research (14 papers), Medical Practices and Rehabilitation (2 papers), Traumatic Brain Injury Research (2 papers), Child Abuse and Trauma (1 paper), Advanced Optical Imaging Technologies (1 paper), Visual perception and processing mechanisms (1 paper), Family and Disability Support Research (1 paper) and Inclusion and Disability in Education and Sport (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Pathology and Forensic Medicine (538 citations), Clinical Psychology (174 citations), Rehabilitation (48 citations), Applied Psychology (28 citations) and Psychiatry and Mental health (78 citations). Peter Ludé has collaborated with scholars based in Switzerland, United Kingdom and Sweden. Frequent co-authors include Paul Kennedy, Nik Taylor, Magnus L. Elfström, Isaac R. Galatzer‐Levy, George A. Bonanno, Emilie F. Smithson, C Ballert, Szilvia Geyh, Elizabeth A. Nick and Franz Michel. Their work appears in journals such as Spinal Cord, Topics in Spinal Cord Injury Rehabilitation, Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Quality of Life Research and Rehabilitation Psychology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact