Peter L. Payne
Impact in
- Economics and Econometrics top 10%
- Historical Economic and Social Studies
Papers in
-
- Historical Economic and Social Studies 11
- History 4
- Scottish History and National Identity 4
- Historical Studies of British Isles 2
- Co-authors
- David E. Nye (1 shared paper)Michael Hughes (1 shared paper)John Scott (1 shared paper)L. E. Davis (2 shared papers)Lance E. Davis (1 shared paper)Paul Uselding (1 shared paper)Louis P. Cain (1 shared paper)Sidney Pollard (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- The Economic History Review (14 papers)Business History (5 papers)Economica (3 papers)Technology and Culture (2 papers)The Journal of Finance (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United KingdomUnited States
In The Last Decade
Peter L. Payne
29 papers receiving 227 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 66
- Economics and Econometrics 130
- Archeology 4
- Finance 33
- Accounting 34
- Management Information Systems 25
Countries citing papers authored by Peter L. Payne
This map shows the geographic impact of Peter L. Payne's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Peter L. Payne with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Peter L. Payne more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Peter L. Payne
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Peter L. Payne. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Peter L. Payne. The network helps show where Peter L. Payne may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 19 scholars most cited alongside Peter L. Payne, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
Showing the 20 most-cited of 35 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1967 | 37 | |
| 2 | 1967 | 34 | |
| 3 | 1980 | 31 | |
| 4 | 1986 | 26 | |
| 5 | 1974 | 21 | |
| 6 | 1957 | 18 | |
| 7 | 1988 | 17 | |
| 8 | 1975 | 13 | |
| 9 | 1980 | 13 | |
| 10 | 1958 | 9 | |
| 11 | 1980 | 7 | |
| 12 | 1981 | 6 | |
| 13 | 1960 | 5 | |
| 14 | 1959 | 5 | |
| 15 | 1995 | 5 | |
| 16 | 1995 | 4 | |
| 17 | 1985 | 4 | |
| 18 | 1982 | 4 | |
| 19 | 1983 | 4 | |
| 20 | 1980 | 3 |
About Peter L. Payne
Peter L. Payne is a scholar working on Economics and Econometrics, History, Anthropology, Paleontology and History and Philosophy of Science, having authored 35 papers that have together received 289 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Historical Economic and Social Studies (11 papers), Scottish History and National Identity (4 papers), Historical Studies of British Isles (2 papers), Metallurgy and Cultural Artifacts (1 paper), Economic, financial, and policy analysis (1 paper), American History and Culture (1 paper), Historical Studies and Socio-cultural Analysis (1 paper) and Colonialism, slavery, and trade (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Economics and Econometrics (130 citations), Archeology (4 citations), Finance (33 citations), Accounting (34 citations) and Management Information Systems (25 citations). Peter L. Payne has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom and United States. Frequent co-authors include David E. Nye, Michael Hughes, John Scott, L. E. Davis, Lance E. Davis, Paul Uselding, Louis P. Cain, Sidney Pollard, William Woodruff and L. S. Pressnell. Their work appears in journals such as The Economic History Review, Business History, Economica, Technology and Culture and The Journal of Finance.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.