Peter King
Impact in
-
- Historical Philosophy and Science
- Philosophy top 5%
- Medieval Philosophy and Theology
- Classical Philosophy and Thought
- Medieval and Classical Philosophy
- Augustinian Studies and Theology
Papers in
- Philosophy 10
- Medieval Philosophy and Theology 6
- Classical Philosophy and Thought 4
- Karl Barth and Christian Theology 3
- Augustinian Studies and Theology 2
- History 2
- Reformation and Early Modern Christianity 2
- Co-authors
- Jorge J. E. Gracia (1 shared paper)Nathan Ballantyne (1 shared paper)Jean Buridan (1 shared paper)Charles Waldegrave (1 shared paper)Simo Knuuttila (1 shared paper)Gyula Klima (1 shared paper)Joël Biard (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- Theoria (1 paper)Metaphilosophy (1 paper)Philosophical Topics (1 paper)The Philosophical Review (1 paper)Canadian Journal of Philosophy (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- CanadaUnited StatesNew Zealand
In The Last Decade
Peter King
13 papers receiving 52 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 30
- History and Philosophy of Science 27
- Philosophy 64
- Classics 5
- Archeology 12
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 10
Countries citing papers authored by Peter King
This map shows the geographic impact of Peter King's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Peter King with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Peter King more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Peter King
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Peter King. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Peter King. The network helps show where Peter King may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 7 scholars most cited alongside Peter King, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2001 | 16 | |
| 2 | 1988 | 15 | |
| 3 | 1992 | 12 | |
| 4 | 1998 | 6 | |
| 5 | 2008 | 6 | |
| 6 | Jean Buridan's Logic: The Treatise on Supposition The Treatise on Consequences | 2011 | 6 |
| 7 | 2000 | 6 | |
| 8 | 2009 | 5 | |
| 9 | 2003 | 5 | |
| 10 | 2016 | 4 | |
| 11 | Duns Scotus on Singular Essences | 2005 | 2 |
| 12 | 1996 | 2 | |
| 13 | Peter Abailard and the problem of universals | 1982 | 1 |
| 14 | Logic : The Treatise on Supposition. The Treatise on Consequences | 1988 | 0 |
| 15 | 2005 | 0 |
About Peter King
Peter King is a scholar working on Philosophy, History, History and Philosophy of Science, Clinical Psychology and Sociology and Political Science, having authored 15 papers that have together received 86 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Medieval Philosophy and Theology (6 papers), Classical Philosophy and Thought (4 papers), Karl Barth and Christian Theology (3 papers), Reformation and Early Modern Christianity (2 papers), Augustinian Studies and Theology (2 papers), Medieval Literature and History (1 paper), Resilience and Mental Health (1 paper) and Family and Disability Support Research (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in History and Philosophy of Science (27 citations), Philosophy (64 citations), Classics (5 citations), Archeology (12 citations) and Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (10 citations). Peter King has collaborated with scholars based in Canada, United States and New Zealand. Frequent co-authors include Jorge J. E. Gracia, Nathan Ballantyne, Jean Buridan, Charles Waldegrave, Simo Knuuttila, Gyula Klima and Joël Biard. Their work appears in journals such as Theoria, Metaphilosophy, Philosophical Topics, The Philosophical Review and Canadian Journal of Philosophy.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.