Paul Thom

724 citations
31 papers · 129 · h-index 7

Impact in

Papers in

Paul Thom

26 papers receiving 98 citations

Peers

Paul Thom
Comparison fields: 5 of 35
  • Philosophy 90
  • History and Philosophy of Science 23
  • Theoretical Computer Science 4
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 27
  • Religious studies 9
Replace Ursula Coope with:
Ursula Coope United Kingdom
Edward Hussey United Kingdom
Mikko Yrjönsuuri Finland
Calvin G. Normore United States
Gyula Klima United States
Peter King Canada
Verity Harte United Kingdom
Henrik Lagerlund Canada
Desmond Paul Henry United Kingdom
Jeffrey E. Brower United States
Paul Thom relative to Ursula Coope United Kingdom Ursula Coope's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×
Ursula Coope · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Paul Thom

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Paul Thom's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Paul Thom with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Paul Thom more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Paul Thom

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Paul Thom. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Paul Thom. The network helps show where Paul Thom may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 8 scholars most cited alongside Paul Thom, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Paul Thom Line = papers co-authored together Paul Thom links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 31 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 198120
2
The Logic of Essentialism: An Interpretation of Aristotle's Modal Syllogistic
201114
3 200712
4 20169
5
Making Sense: A Theory of Interpretation
20008
6 19968
7 19916
8 20105
9
Medieval Modal Systems: Problems and Concepts
20035
10 20084
11 19754
12 20034
13 19774
14 20124
15 19943
16 19793
17 20173
18 19982
19 19992
20 19932

About Paul Thom

Paul Thom is a scholar working on Philosophy, Visual Arts and Performing Arts, History and Philosophy of Science, Music and Law, having authored 31 papers that have together received 129 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Classical Philosophy and Thought (8 papers), Medieval and Classical Philosophy (7 papers), Theatre and Performance Studies (3 papers), Law in Society and Culture (3 papers), Musicology and Musical Analysis (3 papers), Historical Philosophy and Science (3 papers), Islamic Thought and Society Studies (2 papers) and Medieval Philosophy and Theology (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Philosophy (90 citations), History and Philosophy of Science (23 citations), Theoretical Computer Science (4 citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (27 citations) and Religious studies (9 citations). Paul Thom has collaborated with scholars based in Australia and Netherlands. Frequent co-authors include Francis Sparshott, Lydia Goehr, Mikko Yrjönsuuri, E. J. Ashworth, Sara L. Uckelman, Catarina Dutilh Novaes, Stephen Read and Gyula Klima. Their work appears in journals such as History and Philosophy of Logic, Grazer Philosophische Studien, Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic, Arabic Sciences and Philosophy and Apeiron.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact