Peter John Basford
Impact in
- Gastroenterology top 5%
- Gastrointestinal Bleeding Diagnosis and Treatment
- Gastrointestinal Tumor Research and Treatment
- Oncology top 10%
- Colorectal Cancer Screening and Detection
Papers in
- Oncology 9
- Colorectal Cancer Screening and Detection 9
-
- Gastric Cancer Management and Outcomes 3
- Co-authors
- Pradeep Bhandari (10 shared papers)Gaius Longcroft‐Wheaton (6 shared papers)R J Mead (2 shared papers)Andrew Steptoe (1 shared paper)Bernie Higgins (1 shared paper)Moses Duku (1 shared paper)James Neale (2 shared papers)J F Brown (3 shared papers)
- Journals
- Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (3 papers)The Lancet Digital Health (1 paper)Epigenomics (1 paper)British Journal of General Practice (1 paper)Therapeutic Advances in Gastroenterology (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United KingdomIsrael
In The Last Decade
Peter John Basford
15 papers receiving 378 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 44
- Gastroenterology 67
- Oncology 198
- Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine 97
- Physiology 30
- Surgery 49
Countries citing papers authored by Peter John Basford
This map shows the geographic impact of Peter John Basford's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Peter John Basford with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Peter John Basford more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Peter John Basford
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Peter John Basford. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Peter John Basford. The network helps show where Peter John Basford may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 20 scholars most cited alongside Peter John Basford, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2013 | 63 | |
| 2 | 1998 | 56 | |
| 3 | 2013 | 54 | |
| 4 | 2014 | 50 | |
| 5 | 2011 | 46 | |
| 6 | Managing difficult polyps: techniques and pitfalls. | 2013 | 41 |
| 7 | 2016 | 31 | |
| 8 | 2019 | 24 | |
| 9 | 2022 | 9 | |
| 10 | 2015 | 8 | |
| 11 | 2015 | 6 | |
| 12 | 2019 | 4 | |
| 13 | 2023 | 4 | |
| 14 | 2019 | 1 | |
| 15 | 2024 | 1 | |
| 16 | 2011 | 0 |
About Peter John Basford
Peter John Basford is a scholar working on Oncology, Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine, Gastroenterology, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health and Surgery, having authored 16 papers that have together received 398 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Colorectal Cancer Screening and Detection (9 papers), Gastric Cancer Management and Outcomes (3 papers), Innovations in Medical Education (2 papers), Esophageal Cancer Research and Treatment (2 papers), Gastrointestinal Bleeding Diagnosis and Treatment (1 paper), Epigenetics and DNA Methylation (1 paper), Physical Activity and Health (1 paper) and Genetic factors in colorectal cancer (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Gastroenterology (67 citations), Oncology (198 citations), Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine (97 citations), Physiology (30 citations) and Surgery (49 citations). Peter John Basford has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom and Israel. Frequent co-authors include Pradeep Bhandari, Gaius Longcroft‐Wheaton, R J Mead, Andrew Steptoe, Bernie Higgins, Moses Duku, James Neale, J F Brown, Fergus Thursby‐Pelham and Rupam Bhattacharyya. Their work appears in journals such as Gastrointestinal Endoscopy, The Lancet Digital Health, Epigenomics, British Journal of General Practice and Therapeutic Advances in Gastroenterology.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.