Peter J. Scott

148 papers receiving 1.6k citations

Peers

Peter J. Scott
Comparison fields: 5 of 153
  • Computer Science Applications 170
  • Public Administration 98
  • Communication 161
  • Oceanography 218
  • Education 379
Replace Robert A. Croker with:
Robert A. Croker United States
Edward J. Hackett United States
Robert Nisbet United States
Alan Irwin Denmark
Deborah Ann Blackman Australia
Helen Simons United Kingdom
Gertrude Hirsch Hadorn Switzerland
Jan Ch. Karlsson Sweden
RICHARD A. WALKER United States
Richard A. Slaughter Australia
Peter J. Scott relative to Robert A. Croker United States Robert A. Croker's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×3×3.9×
Robert A. Croker · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Peter J. Scott

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Peter J. Scott's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Peter J. Scott with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Peter J. Scott more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Peter J. Scott

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Peter J. Scott. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Peter J. Scott. The network helps show where Peter J. Scott may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Peter J. Scott, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Peter J. Scott Line = papers co-authored together Peter J. Scott links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 159 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2015168
2
Social Software for Life-long Learning
2007140
3 201582
4 198880
5 199072
6 197171
7 199269
8 198056
9 198841
10 199639
11 200338
12 198838
13 201236
14 200532
15 201129
16 201828
17 200627
18
Environment assisted fatigue
199027
19 201925
20 198823

About Peter J. Scott

Peter J. Scott is a scholar working on Computer Science Applications, Public Administration, Developmental and Educational Psychology, Education and Political Science and International Relations, having authored 159 papers that have together received 1.9k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Innovative Teaching and Learning Methods (21 papers), Labor Movements and Unions (15 papers), Online and Blended Learning (14 papers), E-Learning and Knowledge Management (12 papers), Political and Economic history of UK and US (10 papers), Open Education and E-Learning (10 papers), Social Policy and Reform Studies (9 papers) and Higher Education Governance and Development (8 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Computer Science Applications (170 citations), Public Administration (98 citations), Communication (161 citations), Oceanography (218 citations) and Education (379 citations). Peter J. Scott has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Germany. Frequent co-authors include Michael John Risk, Stephen James Williams, Brian S. Morton, Peter J. Cressey, Gwyn Rowley, Adrian Curaj, Liviu Matei, Jamil Salmi, Remus Pricopie and Fiona M Brooks. Their work appears in journals such as New Technology Work and Employment, Journal of Molluscan Studies, Marine Pollution Bulletin, Dissolution Technologies and The International Journal of Human Resource Management.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact