Peter J. Ling
Impact in
-
- American History and Culture
-
- Urban Transport and Accessibility
Papers in
-
- Race, History, and American Society 11
- Educator Training and Historical Pedagogy 1
-
- American History and Culture 3
- Co-authors
- Clay McShane (1 shared paper)Sharon Monteith (5 shared papers)John H. Drabble (1 shared paper)Stephen H. Cutcliffe (1 shared paper)Karal Ann Marling (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- Journal of American History (3 papers)Urban History (2 papers)Australasian Journal of Paramedicine (1 paper)Journal of Historical Sociology (1 paper)Technology and Culture (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United KingdomAustraliaSingapore
In The Last Decade
Peter J. Ling
17 papers receiving 108 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 51
- Marketing 25
- Transportation 18
- History 27
- Music 7
- Sociology and Political Science 87
Countries citing papers authored by Peter J. Ling
This map shows the geographic impact of Peter J. Ling's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Peter J. Ling with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Peter J. Ling more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Peter J. Ling
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Peter J. Ling. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Peter J. Ling. The network helps show where Peter J. Ling may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 5 scholars most cited alongside Peter J. Ling, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
Showing the 20 most-cited of 28 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1995 | 91 | |
| 2 | 2005 | 17 | |
| 3 | 1991 | 12 | |
| 4 | 1995 | 9 | |
| 5 | 2014 | 9 | |
| 6 | 1991 | 8 | |
| 7 | 1991 | 6 | |
| 8 | 2006 | 4 | |
| 9 | 2014 | 3 | |
| 10 | 1996 | 3 | |
| 11 | 2013 | 2 | |
| 12 | 2015 | 2 | |
| 13 | 2014 | 2 | |
| 14 | 2013 | 2 | |
| 15 | 2021 | 1 | |
| 16 | 2012 | 1 | |
| 17 | The first global Google online marketing challenge 2008: Perspectives of ECU student participants | 2008 | 1 |
| 18 | We Shall Overcome: Peter Ling Analyses Martin Luther King's Involvement with Non-Violent Protest in the USA. (Profiles in Power) | 2003 | 0 |
| 19 | 2016 | 0 | |
| 20 | 2014 | 0 |
About Peter J. Ling
Peter J. Ling is a scholar working on Sociology and Political Science, Marketing, Political Science and International Relations, Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law and History, having authored 28 papers that have together received 173 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Race, History, and American Society (11 papers), American Political and Social Dynamics (3 papers), American History and Culture (3 papers), American Environmental and Regional History (3 papers), Diverse Education Studies and Reforms (2 papers), Management and Marketing Education (2 papers), American Constitutional Law and Politics (2 papers) and Educator Training and Historical Pedagogy (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Marketing (25 citations), Transportation (18 citations), History (27 citations), Music (7 citations) and Sociology and Political Science (87 citations). Peter J. Ling has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Australia and Singapore. Frequent co-authors include Clay McShane, Sharon Monteith, John H. Drabble, Stephen H. Cutcliffe and Karal Ann Marling. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of American History, Urban History, Australasian Journal of Paramedicine, Journal of Historical Sociology and Technology and Culture.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.